Core Ultra 5 125H
VS
EPYC 7262

Core Ultra 5 125H vs EPYC 7262

Intel

Core Ultra 5 125H

14 Cores18 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2023
VS
AMD

EPYC 7262

8 Cores16 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 125H

#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
105%
#107
Core Ultra 5 228V
MSRP: $295|Avg: $295
104%
#111
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $180
103%
#117
Core Ultra 5 125H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#119
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
MSRP: $400|Avg: $380
98%
#120
Core i7-11850HE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $75
97%
#124
Core i5-1240P
MSRP: $309|Avg: $200
95%
#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7262

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
500%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
4%
#2
Xeon W-11855M
MSRP: $450|Avg: $200
9%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
8%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
8%
#5
EPYC 7262
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
8%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
94%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
84%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
65%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
64%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7262 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore Ultra 5 125HEPYC 7262
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Meteor Lake-H (2023) / 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 5 125H ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore Ultra 5 125HEPYC 7262
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 125H and EPYC 7262

Intel

Core Ultra 5 125H

The Core Ultra 5 125H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 18 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,754 points. Launch price was $375.

AMD

EPYC 7262

The EPYC 7262 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 20,779 points. Launch price was $575.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 125H packs 14 cores / 18 threads, while the EPYC 7262 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 125H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 125H versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7262 — a 27.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 125H (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 125H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the EPYC 7262 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 125H scores 20,754 against the EPYC 7262's 20,779 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC 7262. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 125H vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7262.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 125HEPYC 7262
Cores / Threads
14 / 18+75%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz+32%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+12%
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)
32 MB (total)+78%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+300%
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm
7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture
Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark
20,754
20,779
Cinebench R23 Multi
11,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,346
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,900
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 125H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7262 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 125HEPYC 7262
Socket
FCBGA2049
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB
RAM Channels
8
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core Ultra 5 125H) / AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7262). Primary use case: EPYC 7262 targets Budget Server / Multi-thread computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 7262 rivals Xeon Silver 4216.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 125HEPYC 7262
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV
Target Use
Budget Server / Multi-thread computing