Core Ultra 5 135H vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Core Ultra 5 135H vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Performance Spectrum

Core Ultra 5 135H

14 / 18

22,116

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

12 / 24

22,066

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 135H vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 135H vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 135H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

2017

Why buy it

✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 135H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,066 vs 22,116).
❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 135H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 135H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 135H better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 5 135H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 5 135H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 135H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 18 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 5 135H is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core Ultra 5 135H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 135H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FCBGA2049 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2, and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 18 threads instead of 12/24. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 5 135H vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 135H

The Core Ultra 5 135H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 18 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,116 points. Launch price was $342.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 135H packs 14 cores / 18 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 5 135H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 135H versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — a 19% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 135H (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 135H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 135H scores 22,116 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 22,066 — a 0.2% lead for the Core Ultra 5 135H. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 135H vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 135H	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Cores / Threads	14 / 18+17%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+21%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+12%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	32 MB+78%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Meteor Lake-H (2023)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	22,116	22,066

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 135H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.