
Core Ultra 5 225

Ryzen 9 5900X
Core Ultra 5 225 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 5 225 vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 5 225 vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 5 225
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $309 less on MSRP ($240 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 82.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 129.7 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($240 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores), while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,020 vs 21,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+220% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 20 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 71.0 vs 129.7 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 225 moves to LGA1851 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core Ultra 5 225.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Core Ultra 5 225?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 225 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 225
The Core Ultra 5 225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 31,137 points. Launch price was $246.


Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 225 packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225 uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225 scores 31,137 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 22.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,020 vs 21,000 (20.9% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,653 vs 2,174, a 19.8% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,028 vs 11,888 (9.2% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10 | 12 / 24+20% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+2% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.7 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 64 MB+220% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+16967% |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 31,137 | 38,955+25% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,020 | 21,000+23% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,653+22% | 2,174 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,028+10% | 11,888 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 225 uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 225 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Core Ultra 5 225 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 225 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860,H810 (Core Ultra 5 225) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+100% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 5 225) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). The Core Ultra 5 225 includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores)), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225 targets Mainstream Desktop / Efficiency, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225 rivals Ryzen 5 8600G; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores) | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Mainstream Desktop / Efficiency | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core Ultra 5 225 was priced at $240, while the Ryzen 9 5900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($240 vs $549), Core Ultra 5 225 was $309 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 225 delivers 129.7 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Core Ultra 5 225 the 58.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $240-56% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 129.7+83% | 71.0 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














