
Core Ultra 5 225H

Core 9 270H
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 225H
Performance Per Dollar Core 9 270H
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 5 225H | Core 9 270H |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 5 225H | Core 9 270H |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225H and Core 9 270H

Core Ultra 5 225H
The Core Ultra 5 225H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,802 points. Launch price was $385.

Core 9 270H
The Core 9 270H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,793 points. Launch price was $697.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 225H packs 14 cores / 14 threads, matching the Core 9 270H's 14 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225H versus 5.8 GHz on the Core 9 270H — a 16.8% clock advantage for the Core 9 270H (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Core 9 270H uses Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225H scores 28,802 against the Core 9 270H's 28,793 — a 0% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,526 vs 16,500 (12.7% advantage for the Core 9 270H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,678 vs 2,800, a 4.5% lead for the Core 9 270H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,337 vs 14,000 (12.6% advantage for the Core 9 270H). L3 cache: 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225H vs 24 MB (total) on the Core 9 270H.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225H | Core 9 270H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14 | 14 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.8 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+59% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB | 24 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | — | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-50% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-H (2025) | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 28,802 | 28,793 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,526 | 16,500+14% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,678 | 2,800+5% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,337 | 14,000+13% |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core 9 270H uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core Ultra 5 225H supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs 20 (Core 9 270H) — the Core Ultra 5 225H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 225H) and Mobile platform (Core 9 270H).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225H | Core 9 270H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+33% | 96 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+40% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc 130T GPU (Core Ultra 5 225H) and Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs) (Core 9 270H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225H targets Professional Content Creation Laptop, Core 9 270H targets Extreme Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H; Core 9 270H rivals Ryzen 9 9900H.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225H | Core 9 270H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc 130T GPU | Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs) |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Professional Content Creation Laptop | Extreme Gaming Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















