Core Ultra 5 225H
VS
EPYC 7303

Core Ultra 5 225H vs EPYC 7303

Intel

Core Ultra 5 225H

14 Cores14 Thrd20 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025
VS
AMD

EPYC 7303

16 Cores32 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 225H

#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
115%
#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
105%
#63
Core Ultra 5 225H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
100%
#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7303

#59
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
MSRP: $409|Avg: $450
136%
#60
Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP: $599|Avg: $418
136%
#61
Xeon Platinum 8270
MSRP: $7405|Avg: N/A
136%
#62
EPYC 4464P
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
131%
#63
EPYC 4345P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
130%
#64
EPYC 4344P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $314
128%
#65
EPYC 4364P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $334
122%
#66
EPYC 4585PX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $826
120%
#67
EPYC 4545P
MSRP: $549|Avg: $595
118%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
104%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
100%
#74
EPYC 7303
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7303 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore Ultra 5 225HEPYC 7303
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 5 225H ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore Ultra 5 225HEPYC 7303
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225H and EPYC 7303

Intel

Core Ultra 5 225H

The Core Ultra 5 225H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,802 points. Launch price was $385.

AMD

EPYC 7303

The EPYC 7303 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,572 points. Launch price was $604.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 225H packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the EPYC 7303 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7303 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225H versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303 — a 36.1% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225H (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 7303 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225H scores 28,802 against the EPYC 7303's 28,572 — a 0.8% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,526 vs 18,000 (21.4% advantage for the EPYC 7303). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,678 vs 1,960, a 31% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,337 vs 11,000 (11.5% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225H). L3 cache: 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225H vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 225HEPYC 7303
Cores / Threads
14 / 14
16 / 32+14%
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+44%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
4.3 GHz+79%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
18 MB
64 MB (total)+256%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
Process
5 nm-29%
7 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark
28,802
28,572
Cinebench R23 Multi
14,526
18,000+24%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,678+37%
1,960
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,337+12%
11,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7303 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 225H versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7303 — the Core Ultra 5 225H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7303 supports up to 204 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 45.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs 8 (EPYC 7303). PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs 128 (EPYC 7303) — the EPYC 7303 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 225H) and SP3 platform (EPYC 7303).

FeatureCore Ultra 5 225HEPYC 7303
Socket
FCBGA2049
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400+25%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
204 GB+59%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
128+357%
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7303). The Core Ultra 5 225H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 130T GPU), while the EPYC 7303 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225H targets Professional Content Creation Laptop, EPYC 7303 targets High-frequency Server Workloads. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H; EPYC 7303 rivals Xeon Gold 6334.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 225HEPYC 7303
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel Arc 130T GPU
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V, SVM
Target Use
Professional Content Creation Laptop
High-frequency Server Workloads