
Core Ultra 5 225H vs EPYC 7303

Core Ultra 5 225H

EPYC 7303
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 225H
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7303
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 5 225H | EPYC 7303 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 5 225H | EPYC 7303 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225H and EPYC 7303

Core Ultra 5 225H
The Core Ultra 5 225H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,802 points. Launch price was $385.

EPYC 7303
The EPYC 7303 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,572 points. Launch price was $604.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 225H packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the EPYC 7303 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7303 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225H versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303 — a 36.1% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225H (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 7303 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225H scores 28,802 against the EPYC 7303's 28,572 — a 0.8% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,526 vs 18,000 (21.4% advantage for the EPYC 7303). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,678 vs 1,960, a 31% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,337 vs 11,000 (11.5% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225H). L3 cache: 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225H vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225H | EPYC 7303 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14 | 16 / 32+14% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+44% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+79% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB | 64 MB (total)+256% |
| L2 Cache | — | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-H (2025) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 28,802 | 28,572 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,526 | 18,000+24% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,678+37% | 1,960 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,337+12% | 11,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7303 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 225H versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7303 — the Core Ultra 5 225H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7303 supports up to 204 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 45.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs 8 (EPYC 7303). PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs 128 (EPYC 7303) — the EPYC 7303 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 225H) and SP3 platform (EPYC 7303).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225H | EPYC 7303 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 204 GB+59% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7303). The Core Ultra 5 225H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 130T GPU), while the EPYC 7303 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225H targets Professional Content Creation Laptop, EPYC 7303 targets High-frequency Server Workloads. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H; EPYC 7303 rivals Xeon Gold 6334.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225H | EPYC 7303 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc 130T GPU | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | Professional Content Creation Laptop | High-frequency Server Workloads |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















