Core 9 270H
VS
Core Ultra 5 225H

Core 9 270H vs Core Ultra 5 225H

Intel

Core 9 270H

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.8 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 225H

14 Cores14 Thrd20 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 9 270H

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
124%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
116%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
114%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
109%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
104%
#21
Core 9 270H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
94%
#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
88%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 225H

#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
115%
#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
105%
#63
Core Ultra 5 225H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
100%
#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core 9 270H delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core Ultra 5 225H in both compute-intensive tasks (0% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 9 270HCore Ultra 5 225H
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 9 270HCore Ultra 5 225H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 9 270H and Core Ultra 5 225H

Intel

Core 9 270H

The Core 9 270H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,793 points. Launch price was $697.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 225H

The Core Ultra 5 225H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,802 points. Launch price was $385.

Processing Power

The Core 9 270H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, matching the Core Ultra 5 225H's 14 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.8 GHz on the Core 9 270H versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225H — a 16.8% clock advantage for the Core 9 270H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core 9 270H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core 9 270H scores 28,793 against the Core Ultra 5 225H's 28,802 — a 0% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,500 vs 14,526 (12.7% advantage for the Core 9 270H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 2,678, a 4.5% lead for the Core 9 270H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 12,337 (12.6% advantage for the Core 9 270H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 9 270H vs 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225H.

FeatureCore 9 270HCore Ultra 5 225H
Cores / Threads
14 / 20
14 / 14
Boost Clock
5.8 GHz+18%
4.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
4.3 GHz+59%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+33%
18 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
5 nm-50%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
PassMark
28,793
28,802
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,500+14%
14,526
Geekbench 6 Single
2,800+5%
2,678
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,000+13%
12,337
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 9 270H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core Ultra 5 225H supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core 9 270H) vs 28 (Core Ultra 5 225H) — the Core Ultra 5 225H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile platform (Core 9 270H) and WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 225H).

FeatureCore 9 270HCore Ultra 5 225H
Socket
FCBGA1744
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB
128 GB+33%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
28+40%
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs) (Core 9 270H) and Intel Arc 130T GPU (Core Ultra 5 225H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 9 270H targets Extreme Gaming Laptop, Core Ultra 5 225H targets Professional Content Creation Laptop. Direct competitor: Core 9 270H rivals Ryzen 9 9900H; Core Ultra 5 225H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H.

FeatureCore 9 270HCore Ultra 5 225H
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs)
Intel Arc 130T GPU
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Extreme Gaming Laptop
Professional Content Creation Laptop