Core 9 270H
VS
Xeon W-3245M

Core 9 270H vs Xeon W-3245M

Intel

Core 9 270H

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.8 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Xeon W-3245M

16 Cores32 Thrd205 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 9 270H

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
124%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
116%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
114%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
109%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
104%
#21
Core 9 270H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
94%
#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
88%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3245M

#520
Xeon 6780E
MSRP: $11350|Avg: $8513
134%
#521
Xeon E5-2697A v4
MSRP: $2891|Avg: $121
131%
#522
Xeon Gold 6134
MSRP: $2214|Avg: $378
131%
#523
Xeon Gold 6138T
MSRP: $2742|Avg: $400
130%
#524
Xeon E5-2675 V3
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $100
128%
#524
Xeon E5-2676 V3
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $36
128%
#524
Xeon E7-4880 v2
MSRP: $6619|Avg: $185
128%
#527
Xeon Platinum 8592+
MSRP: $11600|Avg: $11600
127%
#528
Xeon E5-2687W v3
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $749
119%
#529
Xeon Max 9480
MSRP: $12980|Avg: $12980
112%
#530
Xeon E5-2689 v4
MSRP: $2723|Avg: $100
110%
#531
EPYC 7543
MSRP: $10257|Avg: $468
108%
#532
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
MSRP: $7719|Avg: $7719
106%
#533
Xeon Gold 6250
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $2000
106%
#534
Xeon E5-2699 v4
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $400
105%
#535
Xeon W-3245M
MSRP: $5002|Avg: $5002
100%
#536
Xeon W-3265M
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $3500
99%
#537
Xeon Platinum 8180
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $2363
67%
#538
Xeon Platinum 8280M
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $6223
66%
#539
Xeon Platinum 8280
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $2940
65%
#540
Xeon E7-8891 v3
MSRP: $6841|Avg: $418
55%
#541
Xeon E5-4669 v4
MSRP: $7007|Avg: $300
44%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($5,002) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W-3245M is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore 9 270HXeon W-3245M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5,002)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 9 270H ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($5,002 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore 9 270HXeon W-3245M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5,002)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 9 270H and Xeon W-3245M

Intel

Core 9 270H

The Core 9 270H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,793 points. Launch price was $697.

Intel

Xeon W-3245M

The Xeon W-3245M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,494 points. Launch price was $5,002.

Processing Power

The Core 9 270H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon W-3245M offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3245M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.8 GHz on the Core 9 270H versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245M — a 23.1% clock advantage for the Core 9 270H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core 9 270H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon W-3245M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 9 270H scores 28,793 against the Xeon W-3245M's 28,494 — a 1% lead for the Core 9 270H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,500 vs 18,500 (11.4% advantage for the Xeon W-3245M). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 1,474, a 62% lead for the Core 9 270H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 11,572 (19% advantage for the Core 9 270H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 9 270H vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245M.

FeatureCore 9 270HXeon W-3245M
Cores / Threads
14 / 20
16 / 32+14%
Boost Clock
5.8 GHz+26%
4.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
3.2 GHz+19%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+9%
22 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
16 MB+700%
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
28,793+1%
28,494
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,500
18,500+12%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,800+90%
1,474
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,000+21%
11,572
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 9 270H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3245M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core 9 270H versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3245M — the Core 9 270H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3245M supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core 9 270H) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245M). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core 9 270H) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245M) — the Xeon W-3245M offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile platform (Core 9 270H) and C621 (Xeon W-3245M).

FeatureCore 9 270HXeon W-3245M
Socket
FCBGA1744
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400+25%
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB
2048 GB+2033%
RAM Channels
2
6+200%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
64+220%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core 9 270H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3245M supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core 9 270H) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3245M). The Core 9 270H includes integrated graphics (Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs)), while the Xeon W-3245M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 9 270H targets Extreme Gaming Laptop, Xeon W-3245M targets Professional Workstation / Mac Pro. Direct competitor: Core 9 270H rivals Ryzen 9 9900H; Xeon W-3245M rivals Xeon Gold 6242.

FeatureCore 9 270HXeon W-3245M
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs)
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Extreme Gaming Laptop
Professional Workstation / Mac Pro