Core 9 270H vs EPYC 7303
Core 9 270H
EPYC 7303
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 9 270H
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7303
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 9 270H | EPYC 7303 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) / 10 nm) | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 9 270H | EPYC 7303 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 9 270H and EPYC 7303
Core 9 270H
The Core 9 270H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,793 points. Launch price was $697.
EPYC 7303
The EPYC 7303 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,572 points. Launch price was $604.
Processing Power
The Core 9 270H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 7303 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7303 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.8 GHz on the Core 9 270H versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303 — a 52.2% clock advantage for the Core 9 270H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core 9 270H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 7303 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 9 270H scores 28,793 against the EPYC 7303's 28,572 — a 0.8% lead for the Core 9 270H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,500 vs 18,000 (8.7% advantage for the EPYC 7303). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 1,960, a 35.3% lead for the Core 9 270H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 11,000 (24% advantage for the Core 9 270H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 9 270H vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303.
| Feature | Core 9 270H | EPYC 7303 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 16 / 32+14% |
| Boost Clock | 5.8 GHz+71% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+13% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 28,793 | 28,572 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,500 | 18,000+9% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,800+43% | 1,960 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,000+27% | 11,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 9 270H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7303 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core 9 270H versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7303 — the Core 9 270H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7303 supports up to 204 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 72% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core 9 270H) vs 8 (EPYC 7303). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core 9 270H) vs 128 (EPYC 7303) — the EPYC 7303 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile platform (Core 9 270H) and SP3 platform (EPYC 7303).
| Feature | Core 9 270H | EPYC 7303 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | 204 GB+113% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core 9 270H) vs AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7303). The Core 9 270H includes integrated graphics (Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs)), while the EPYC 7303 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 9 270H targets Extreme Gaming Laptop, EPYC 7303 targets High-frequency Server Workloads. Direct competitor: Core 9 270H rivals Ryzen 9 9900H; EPYC 7303 rivals Xeon Gold 6334.
| Feature | Core 9 270H | EPYC 7303 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | Extreme Gaming Laptop | High-frequency Server Workloads |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 9 270H and EPYC 7303
