Core 9 270H vs Ryzen 7 8845HS

Core 9 270H vs Ryzen 7 8845HS Performance Spectrum

Core 9 270H

14 / 20

28,793

+1.1%

28,470

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 9 270H vs Ryzen 7 8845HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 9 270H vs Ryzen 7 8845HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 9 270H

2024

Why buy it

✅+12% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,500 vs 17,500).

Ryzen 7 8845HS

2023

Why buy it

✅+6.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,500 vs 2,800).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core 9 270H better than Ryzen 7 8845HS?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 9 270H is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 8845HS pulls ahead with 6.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core 9 270H also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 8845HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 9 270H still makes the most sense overall. Core 9 270H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 9 270H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core 9 270H vs Ryzen 7 8845HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 9 270H

The Core 9 270H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,793 points. Launch price was $697.

Ryzen 7 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,470 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 9 270H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8845HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core 9 270H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.8 GHz on the Core 9 270H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8845HS — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Core 9 270H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core 9 270H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8845HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core 9 270H scores 28,793 against the Ryzen 7 8845HS's 28,470 — a 1.1% lead for the Core 9 270H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,500 vs 17,500 (5.9% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8845HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 2,500, a 11.3% lead for the Core 9 270H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 12,250 (13.3% advantage for the Core 9 270H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 9 270H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8845HS.

Feature	Core 9 270H	Ryzen 7 8845HS
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.8 GHz+14%	5.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3.8 GHz+41%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+50%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	4 nm-60%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
PassMark	28,793+1%	28,470
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,500	17,500+6%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,800+12%	2,500
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,000+14%	12,250

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 9 270H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 8845HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core 9 270H versus LPDDR5x-7500 on the Ryzen 7 8845HS — the Ryzen 7 8845HS supports 17.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 8845HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Mobile platform (Core 9 270H) and SoC (Ryzen 7 8845HS).

Feature	Core 9 270H	Ryzen 7 8845HS
Socket	FCBGA1744	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400	LPDDR5x-7500+17%
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	256 GB+167%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core 9 270H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 8845HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core 9 270H) vs AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 8845HS). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs) (Core 9 270H) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 8845HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 9 270H targets Extreme Gaming Laptop, Ryzen 7 8845HS targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core 9 270H rivals Ryzen 9 9900H; Ryzen 7 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H.

Feature	Core 9 270H	Ryzen 7 8845HS
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs)	Radeon 780M
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V (SVM)
Target Use	Extreme Gaming Laptop	Gaming