Core 9 270H
VS
Ryzen 9 7940H

Core 9 270H vs Ryzen 9 7940H

Intel

Core 9 270H

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.8 GHz2024
VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 7940H

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 9 270H

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
124%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
116%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
114%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
109%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
104%
#21
Core 9 270H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
94%
#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
88%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 9 270H leads in gaming performance. However, the Ryzen 9 7940H is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore 9 270HRyzen 9 7940H
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Phoenix (2023−2024) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 9 270HRyzen 9 7940H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 9 270H and Ryzen 9 7940H

Intel

Core 9 270H

The Core 9 270H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,793 points. Launch price was $697.

AMD

Ryzen 9 7940H

The Ryzen 9 7940H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 29,151 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core 9 270H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7940H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core 9 270H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.8 GHz on the Core 9 270H versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940H — a 10.9% clock advantage for the Core 9 270H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core 9 270H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7940H uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core 9 270H scores 28,793 against the Ryzen 9 7940H's 29,151 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,500 vs 17,200 (4.2% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 2,646, a 5.7% lead for the Core 9 270H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 13,495 (3.7% advantage for the Core 9 270H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 9 270H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940H.

FeatureCore 9 270HRyzen 9 7940H
Cores / Threads
14 / 20+75%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.8 GHz+12%
5.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
4 GHz+48%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+50%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
4 nm-60%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Phoenix (2023−2024)
PassMark
28,793
29,151+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,500
17,200+4%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,800+6%
2,646
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,000+4%
13,495
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 9 270H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7940H uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 7940H supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB 90.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Mobile platform (Core 9 270H) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 9 7940H).

FeatureCore 9 270HRyzen 9 7940H
Socket
FCBGA1744
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB
256 GB+167%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 7940H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core 9 270H) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 9 7940H). Both include integrated graphics Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs) (Core 9 270H) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 7940H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 9 270H targets Extreme Gaming Laptop, Ryzen 9 7940H targets High-performance Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core 9 270H rivals Ryzen 9 9900H; Ryzen 9 7940H rivals Core i9-13900H.

FeatureCore 9 270HRyzen 9 7940H
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs)
Radeon 780M
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V, SVM
Target Use
Extreme Gaming Laptop
High-performance Gaming Laptop