Core Ultra 5 225H vs Ryzen 7 260

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 5 225H

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 20W instead of 45W, a 25W reduction.
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen 7 260

2025

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225H across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (28,339 vs 28,802).
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 225H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌125% higher power demand at 45W vs 20W.

Core Ultra 5 225H

2025

Ryzen 7 260

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 20W instead of 45W, a 25W reduction.
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225H across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (28,339 vs 28,802).
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 225H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌125% higher power demand at 45W vs 20W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 225H better than Ryzen 7 260?

Yes. Core Ultra 5 225H is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 3.7% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.6% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 5 225H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 3.7% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 225H is the better fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 14 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 5 225H is the smarter buy by a wide margin for any fresh desktop build. Core Ultra 5 225H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 260 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop CPU, not because it is a serious desktop gaming option. It simply cannot keep up with modern games, especially when the gap is already 3.7% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 260 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core Ultra 5 225H Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 260 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core Ultra 5 225H	Ryzen 7 260
1080p
low	299 FPS	265 FPS
medium	262 FPS	240 FPS
high	218 FPS	202 FPS
ultra	187 FPS	174 FPS
1440p
low	245 FPS	234 FPS
medium	193 FPS	192 FPS
high	157 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	138 FPS
4K
low	168 FPS	162 FPS
medium	134 FPS	135 FPS
high	104 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	91 FPS

Open Core Ultra 5 225H Open Ryzen 7 260

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core Ultra 5 225H	Ryzen 7 260
1080p
low	685 FPS	485 FPS
medium	543 FPS	399 FPS
high	432 FPS	341 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	304 FPS
1440p
low	566 FPS	423 FPS
medium	471 FPS	367 FPS
high	385 FPS	314 FPS
ultra	327 FPS	267 FPS
4K
low	349 FPS	279 FPS
medium	293 FPS	253 FPS
high	267 FPS	237 FPS
ultra	233 FPS	204 FPS

Open Core Ultra 5 225H Open Ryzen 7 260

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core Ultra 5 225H	Ryzen 7 260
1080p
low	720 FPS	708 FPS
medium	720 FPS	708 FPS
high	720 FPS	708 FPS
ultra	653 FPS	623 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	708 FPS
medium	720 FPS	644 FPS
high	624 FPS	544 FPS
ultra	537 FPS	467 FPS
4K
low	628 FPS	540 FPS
medium	519 FPS	474 FPS
high	458 FPS	421 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	357 FPS

Open Core Ultra 5 225H Open Ryzen 7 260

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core Ultra 5 225H	Ryzen 7 260
1080p
low	720 FPS	708 FPS
medium	720 FPS	708 FPS
high	720 FPS	708 FPS
ultra	720 FPS	708 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	708 FPS
medium	720 FPS	708 FPS
high	677 FPS	657 FPS
ultra	579 FPS	572 FPS
4K
low	604 FPS	574 FPS
medium	538 FPS	511 FPS
high	486 FPS	455 FPS
ultra	423 FPS	393 FPS

Open Core Ultra 5 225H Open Ryzen 7 260

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225H and Ryzen 7 260

Core Ultra 5 225H

The Core Ultra 5 225H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,802 points. Launch price was $385.

Ryzen 7 260

The Ryzen 7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,339 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 225H packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 7 260 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 260 — a 4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 260 (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 260 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225H scores 28,802 against the Ryzen 7 260's 28,339 — a 1.6% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H. L3 cache: 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 260.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 225H	Ryzen 7 260
Cores / Threads	14 / 14+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz	5.1 GHz+4%
Base Clock	4.3 GHz+13%	3.8 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB+13%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm	4 nm-20%
Architecture	Arrow Lake-H (2025)	Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark	28,802+2%	28,339
Cinebench R23 Multi	14,526	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,678	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	12,337	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 260 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core Ultra 5 225H supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 260) — the Core Ultra 5 225H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 225H	Ryzen 7 260
Socket	FCBGA2049	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400	DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	28+40%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 5 225H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 260 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 260). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc 130T GPU (Core Ultra 5 225H) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 260) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225H targets Professional Content Creation Laptop, Ryzen 7 260 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 225H	Ryzen 7 260
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel Arc 130T GPU	Radeon 780M
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Professional Content Creation Laptop	Mobile