Core Ultra 5 225H vs Xeon D-2795NT

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 225H vs Xeon D-2795NT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 225H vs Xeon D-2795NT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 225H

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +40.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 20W instead of 110W, a 90W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc 130T GPU, while Xeon D-2795NT needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,526 vs 15,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2795NT, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.

Xeon D-2795NT

2022

Why buy it

✅+3.3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌450% higher power demand at 110W vs 20W.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 225H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 225H better than Xeon D-2795NT?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-2795NT makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 5 225H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-2795NT is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 5 225H still makes the most sense overall. Core Ultra 5 225H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 40.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 225H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022) and a healthier platform with FCBGA2049 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA2579. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 5 225H vs Xeon D-2795NT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 225H

The Core Ultra 5 225H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,802 points. Launch price was $385.

Xeon D-2795NT

The Xeon D-2795NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,463 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 225H packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon D-2795NT offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon D-2795NT has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225H versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2795NT — a 45% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225H (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225H is built on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225H scores 28,802 against the Xeon D-2795NT's 28,463 — a 1.2% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,526 vs 15,000 (3.2% advantage for the Xeon D-2795NT). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,678 vs 1,962, a 30.9% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,337 vs 11,898 (3.6% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225H). L3 cache: 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225H vs 30 MB on the Xeon D-2795NT.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 225H	Xeon D-2795NT
Cores / Threads	14 / 14	20 / 40+43%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+58%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	4.3 GHz+115%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB	30 MB+67%
Process	5 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Arrow Lake-H (2025)	—
PassMark	28,802+1%	28,463
Cinebench R23 Multi	14,526	15,000+3%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,678+36%	1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi	12,337+4%	11,898

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 225H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon D-2795NT uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 225H versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon D-2795NT — the Core Ultra 5 225H supports 118.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon D-2795NT supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs 4 (Xeon D-2795NT). PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 5 225H) vs 32 (Xeon D-2795NT) — the Xeon D-2795NT offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 225H) and SoC platform (Xeon D-2795NT).

Feature	Core Ultra 5 225H	Xeon D-2795NT
Socket	FCBGA2049	FCBGA2579
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400+118%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1024 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	32+14%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 5 225H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon D-2795NT supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 5 225H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 130T GPU), while the Xeon D-2795NT requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225H targets Professional Content Creation Laptop, Xeon D-2795NT targets Networking / Edge Computing / SoC. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H; Xeon D-2795NT rivals EPYC 7302.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 225H	Xeon D-2795NT
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel Arc 130T GPU	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Professional Content Creation Laptop	Networking / Edge Computing / SoC