
Core Ultra 5 226V

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
Core Ultra 5 226V vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 5 226V vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 5 226V vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 5 226V
2024Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc 130V, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 17W, a 2W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,191 vs 18,400).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 226V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 226V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 226V better than Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 226V vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 226V
The Core Ultra 5 226V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,400 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,191 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 226V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 226V versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 226V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U uses Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 226V scores 18,400 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U's 18,191 — a 1.1% lead for the Core Ultra 5 226V. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 226V vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 226V | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz+5% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) |
| PassMark | 18,400+1% | 18,191 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,041 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 226V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 226V | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5X-8533 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 226V) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U). The Core Ultra 5 226V includes integrated graphics (Arc 130V), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 226V | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Arc 130V | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












