
Core Ultra 5 226V

Ryzen Embedded V2748
Core Ultra 5 226V vs Ryzen Embedded V2748 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 5 226V vs Ryzen Embedded V2748 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 5 226V vs Ryzen Embedded V2748: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 5 226V
2024Why buy it
- β Costs $9 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- β Draws 17W instead of 45W, a 28W reduction.
- β Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Arc 130V, while Ryzen Embedded V2748 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded V2748 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (18,400 vs 18,434).
Ryzen Embedded V2748
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- β3% HIGHER MSRP$309 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- β164.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 17W.
- βOlder platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 226V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 226V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Embedded V2748 better than Core Ultra 5 226V?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 226V vs Ryzen Embedded V2748 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 226V
The Core Ultra 5 226V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,400 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Embedded V2748
The Ryzen Embedded V2748 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020β2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.25 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,434 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 226V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen Embedded V2748's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 226V versus 4.25 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2748 β a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 226V (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 226V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 uses Renoir (2020β2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 226V scores 18,400 against the Ryzen Embedded V2748's 18,434 β a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V2748. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 226V | Ryzen Embedded V2748 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+6% | 4.25 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.9 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Renoir (2020β2023) |
| PassMark | 18,400 | 18,434 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,041 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 226V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 226V | Ryzen Embedded V2748 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5X-8533 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 226V) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V2748). The Core Ultra 5 226V includes integrated graphics (Arc 130V), while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 226V | Ryzen Embedded V2748 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | Arc 130V | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | Yes | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core Ultra 5 226V was priced at $300, while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 came in at $309. On launch pricing ($300 vs $309), Core Ultra 5 226V was $9 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 226V delivers 61.3 pts/$ vs 59.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V2748 β making the Core Ultra 5 226V the 2.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 226V | Ryzen Embedded V2748 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-3% | $309 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.3+3% | 59.7 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














