Core Ultra 5 226V
VS
Ryzen Embedded V2748

Core Ultra 5 226V vs Ryzen Embedded V2748

Intel

Core Ultra 5 226V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded V2748

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.25 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 226V

#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
109%
#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
108%
#86
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
107%
#96
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
100%
#97
Core Ultra 5 226V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
96%
#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
95%
#107
Core Ultra 5 228V
MSRP: $295|Avg: $295
94%
#111
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $180
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Embedded V2748

#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
109%
#327
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $452
108%
#328
Core i9-9900KS
MSRP: $513|Avg: $350
108%
#329
Core i5-11600T
MSRP: $262|Avg: $262
107%
#330
Core i9-9900K
MSRP: $488|Avg: $331
107%
#331
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
MSRP: $899|Avg: $540
106%
#332
Celeron G4930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
106%
#333
Core i9-9920X
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $464
105%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
103%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
103%
#336
Core i7-8700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $196
101%
#337
Ryzen 5 3600XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $357
101%
#338
Core i9-10980XE
MSRP: $979|Avg: $620
101%
#339
Core i5-8500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $149
101%
#340
Core i9-9900KF
MSRP: $488|Avg: $350
100%
#341
Ryzen Embedded V2748
MSRP: $309|Avg: $359
100%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
99%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
96%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
96%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
95%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
92%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
92%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
92%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
91%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
90%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
90%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
88%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
88%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
88%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core Ultra 5 226V leads in gaming performance. However, the Ryzen Embedded V2748 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore Ultra 5 226VRyzen Embedded V2748
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($300)
⚠️ Higher cost ($359)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Renoir (2020−2023) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: The Core Ultra 5 226V leads not only in performance but also in value. It is effectively 16% cheaper ($300 vs $359) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore Ultra 5 226VRyzen Embedded V2748
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+19%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($300)
⚠️ Higher cost ($359)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 226V and Ryzen Embedded V2748

Intel

Core Ultra 5 226V

The Core Ultra 5 226V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,400 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V2748

The Ryzen Embedded V2748 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.25 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,434 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 226V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen Embedded V2748's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 226V versus 4.25 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2748 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 226V (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 226V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 226V scores 18,400 against the Ryzen Embedded V2748's 18,434 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V2748. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 226VRyzen Embedded V2748
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz+6%
4.25 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.9 GHz+38%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)+400%
512K (per core)
Process
3 nm-57%
7 nm
Architecture
Lunar Lake (2024)
Renoir (2020−2023)
PassMark
18,400
18,434
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,041
Geekbench 6 Single
1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 226V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 226VRyzen Embedded V2748
Socket
FCBGA2833
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5X-8533
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 226V) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V2748). The Core Ultra 5 226V includes integrated graphics (Arc 130V), while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 226VRyzen Embedded V2748
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Arc 130V
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

The Core Ultra 5 226V launched at $300 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 debuted at $309. At current prices ($300 vs $359), the Core Ultra 5 226V is $59 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 226V delivers 61.3 pts/$ vs 51.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V2748 — making the Core Ultra 5 226V the 17.7% better value option.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 226VRyzen Embedded V2748
MSRP
$300-3%
$309
Avg Price (30d)
$300-16%
$359
Performance per Dollar
61.3+19%
51.3
Release Date
2024
2020