Core Ultra 5 226V vs Xeon E5-2697 v3

Intel

Core Ultra 5 226V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024
Core Ultra family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2697 v3

14 Cores28 Thrd145 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······

Core Ultra 5 226V vs Xeon E5-2697 v3 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 226V vs Xeon E5-2697 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 226V vs Xeon E5-2697 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 226V

2024

Why buy it

  • +1.2% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 17W instead of 145W, a 128W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Arc 130V, while Xeon E5-2697 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2697 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 35 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2697 v3, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2697 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2697 v3

2014

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +337.5% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (18,182 vs 18,400).
  • 752.9% higher power demand at 145W vs 17W.
  • Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 226V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 226V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 226V better than Xeon E5-2697 v3?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2697 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 5 226V is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 226V is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 5 226V is the better buy right now. Core Ultra 5 226V comes in at an unclear MSRP at $300 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2697 v3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (61.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 226V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2014), a healthier platform with FCBGA2833 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 14/28, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 5 226V vs Xeon E5-2697 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 226V

The Core Ultra 5 226V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,400 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon E5-2697 v3

The Xeon E5-2697 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 18,182 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 226V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2697 v3 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2697 v3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 226V versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697 v3 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 226V (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 226V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon E5-2697 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 226V scores 18,400 against the Xeon E5-2697 v3's 18,182 — a 1.2% lead for the Core Ultra 5 226V. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 226V vs 35 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2697 v3.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 226VXeon E5-2697 v3
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
14 / 28+75%
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz+25%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz+24%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
35 MB (total)+338%
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)
256K (per core)+10140%
Process
3 nm-86%
22 nm
Architecture
Lunar Lake (2024)
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark
18,400+1%
18,182
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,041
Geekbench 6 Single
1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 226V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2697 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 226VXeon E5-2697 v3
Socket
FCBGA2833
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5X-8533
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 226V) / not specified (Xeon E5-2697 v3). The Core Ultra 5 226V includes integrated graphics (Arc 130V), while the Xeon E5-2697 v3 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 226VXeon E5-2697 v3
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Arc 130V
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d