Core Ultra 5 235 vs Xeon W-3275M
Core Ultra 5 235
Xeon W-3275M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 235
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3275M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 5 235 | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($269) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,449) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 5 235 | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1534%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($269) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,449) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 235 and Xeon W-3275M
Core Ultra 5 235
The Core Ultra 5 235 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 39,924 points. Launch price was $257.
Xeon W-3275M
The Xeon W-3275M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 40,419 points. Launch price was $7,453.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 235 packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon W-3275M offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3275M has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275M — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 235 uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon W-3275M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 235 scores 39,924 against the Xeon W-3275M's 40,419 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon W-3275M. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 235 vs 38.5 MB on the Xeon W-3275M.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235 | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14 | 28 / 56+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+9% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+36% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 38.5 MB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core) | 28 MB+833% |
| Process | 3 nm-79% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 39,924 | 40,419+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,600 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 235 uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3275M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 235 versus 2933 on the Xeon W-3275M — the Xeon W-3275M supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3275M supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 256 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 5 235) vs 6 (Xeon W-3275M). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 5 235) vs 64 (Xeon W-3275M) — the Xeon W-3275M offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 235) and C620 (Xeon W-3275M).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235 | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | 2933+58560% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+13107100% | 2048 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 64+220% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3275M supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 5 235 includes integrated graphics (Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU), while the Xeon W-3275M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 235 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 235 rivals Ryzen 5 8600G; Xeon W-3275M rivals EPYC 7742.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235 | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Mainstream Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 5 235 launched at $257 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3275M debuted at $4449. At current prices ($269 vs $4449), the Core Ultra 5 235 is $4180 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 235 delivers 148.4 pts/$ vs 9.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3275M — making the Core Ultra 5 235 the 176.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235 | Xeon W-3275M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $257-94% | $4449 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $269-94% | $4449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 148.4+1531% | 9.1 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 5 235 and Xeon W-3275M
