Core Ultra 5 236V vs Ryzen Embedded V2748

Intel

Core Ultra 5 236V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2024
Core Ultra family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded V2748

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.25 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······

Core Ultra 5 236V vs Ryzen Embedded V2748 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 236V vs Ryzen Embedded V2748 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 236V vs Ryzen Embedded V2748: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 236V

2024

Why buy it

  • Draws 17W instead of 45W, a 28W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded V2748 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (18,313 vs 18,434).

Ryzen Embedded V2748

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 236V mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 164.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 17W.
  • Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 236V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded V2748 better than Core Ultra 5 236V?
Yes. Ryzen Embedded V2748 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Embedded V2748 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded V2748 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Embedded V2748 is the better buy right now. Ryzen Embedded V2748 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $309 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (59.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 236V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020) and a healthier platform with FCBGA2833 and DDR5 instead of FP6. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 5 236V vs Ryzen Embedded V2748 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 236V

The Core Ultra 5 236V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,313 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V2748

The Ryzen Embedded V2748 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.25 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,434 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 236V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen Embedded V2748's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 236V versus 4.25 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2748 — a 10.1% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 236V (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 236V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 236V scores 18,313 against the Ryzen Embedded V2748's 18,434 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V2748. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 236VRyzen Embedded V2748
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.7 GHz+11%
4.25 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.9 GHz+38%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)
512K (per core)+20380%
Process
3 nm-57%
7 nm
Architecture
Lunar Lake (2024)
Renoir (2020−2023)
PassMark
18,313
18,434
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 236V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 236VRyzen Embedded V2748
Socket
FCBGA2833
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core Ultra 5 236V was priced at $0, while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 came in at $309. On launch pricing ($0 vs $309), Core Ultra 5 236V was $309 cheaper.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 236VRyzen Embedded V2748
MSRP
$0-100%
$309
Performance per Dollar
59.7
Release Date
2024
2020

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.