Core Ultra 5 236V
VS
Xeon E5-2697 v3

Core Ultra 5 236V vs Xeon E5-2697 v3

Intel

Core Ultra 5 236V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2697 v3

14 Cores28 Thrd145 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2697 v3

#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
106%
#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
101%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
101%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
101%
#101
Xeon E5-2697 v3
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
100%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core Ultra 5 236V (2024) utilizes 3 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore Ultra 5 236VXeon E5-2697 v3
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($403)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2697 v3 (2014) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore Ultra 5 236VXeon E5-2697 v3
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($403)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 236V and Xeon E5-2697 v3

Intel

Core Ultra 5 236V

The Core Ultra 5 236V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,313 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon E5-2697 v3

The Xeon E5-2697 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 18,182 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 236V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2697 v3 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2697 v3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 236V versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697 v3 — a 26.5% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 236V (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 236V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon E5-2697 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 236V scores 18,313 against the Xeon E5-2697 v3's 18,182 — a 0.7% lead for the Core Ultra 5 236V. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 236V vs 35 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2697 v3.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 236VXeon E5-2697 v3
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
14 / 28+75%
Boost Clock
4.7 GHz+31%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz+24%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
35 MB (total)+338%
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)+900%
256K (per core)
Process
3 nm-86%
22 nm
Architecture
Lunar Lake (2024)
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark
18,313
18,182
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 236V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2697 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 236VXeon E5-2697 v3
Socket
FCBGA2833
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0