Core Ultra 5 245HX vs EPYC 7352

Core Ultra 5 245HX vs EPYC 7352 Performance Spectrum

Core Ultra 5 245HX

14 / 14

39,605

0.0%

40,370

+1.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 245HX vs EPYC 7352 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 245HX vs EPYC 7352: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 245HX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 155W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2114 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics, while EPYC 7352 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (39,605 vs 40,370).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7352, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7352

2019

Why buy it

✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 245HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,350 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 245HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌181.8% higher power demand at 155W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 245HX moves to FCBGA2114 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 245HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 245HX better than EPYC 7352?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7352 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 5 245HX is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7352 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 5 245HX is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7352 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core Ultra 5 245HX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,350 MSRP, and it still gives you a 23.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7352 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.9% better PassMark. EPYC 7352 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (29.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 245HX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with FCBGA2114 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 5 245HX vs EPYC 7352 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 245HX

The Core Ultra 5 245HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 39,605 points. Launch price was $499.

EPYC 7352

The EPYC 7352 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,370 points. Launch price was $1,350.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 245HX packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the EPYC 7352 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7352 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245HX versus 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7352 — a 45.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 245HX (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 245HX uses the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the EPYC 7352 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 245HX scores 39,605 against the EPYC 7352's 40,370 — a 1.9% lead for the EPYC 7352. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245HX vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7352.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 245HX	EPYC 7352
Cores / Threads	14 / 14	24 / 48+71%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+59%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+35%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	3 MB (per core)+500%	512 kB (per core)
Process	3 nm-57%	7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture	Arrow Lake-HX (2025)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark	39,605	40,370+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	32,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,112
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	7,276

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 245HX uses the FCBGA2114 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7352 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245HX versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7352 — the Core Ultra 5 245HX supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7352 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 5 245HX) vs 8 (EPYC 7352). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 5 245HX) vs 128 (EPYC 7352) — the EPYC 7352 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Arrow Lake-HX (Core Ultra 5 245HX) and SP3,Rome (EPYC 7352).

Feature	Core Ultra 5 245HX	EPYC 7352
Socket	FCBGA2114	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	6400+100%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	4096 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	128+433%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 5 245HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 245HX) vs AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7352). The Core Ultra 5 245HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics), while the EPYC 7352 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7352 targets High-density Computing / Server. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 245HX rivals Ryzen 7 8845HS; EPYC 7352 rivals Xeon Gold 6242.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 245HX	EPYC 7352
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V, SEV
Target Use	—	High-density Computing / Server