Core Ultra 5 245HX vs Xeon Gold 6338

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 245HX vs Xeon Gold 6338 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 245HX vs Xeon Gold 6338: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 245HX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 205W, a 150W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2114 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics, while Xeon Gold 6338 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (39,605 vs 40,225).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 48 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6338, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Gold 6338

2021

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 245HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,990 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 245HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌272.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 245HX moves to FCBGA2114 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 245HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 245HX better than Xeon Gold 6338?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6338 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 5 245HX is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6338 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 5 245HX is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 6338 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core Ultra 5 245HX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,990 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6338 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.6% better PassMark. Xeon Gold 6338 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 245HX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with FCBGA2114 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 5 245HX vs Xeon Gold 6338 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 245HX

The Core Ultra 5 245HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 39,605 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon Gold 6338

The Xeon Gold 6338 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 40,225 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 245HX packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6338 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6338 has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245HX versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6338 — a 45.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 245HX (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 245HX is built on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 245HX scores 39,605 against the Xeon Gold 6338's 40,225 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 6338. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245HX vs 48 MB on the Xeon Gold 6338.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 245HX	Xeon Gold 6338
Cores / Threads	14 / 14	32 / 64+129%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+59%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+55%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	48 MB+100%
L2 Cache	3 MB (per core)	—
Process	3 nm-70%	10 nm
Architecture	Arrow Lake-HX (2025)	—
PassMark	39,605	40,225+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 245HX uses the FCBGA2114 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6338 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245HX versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6338 — the Core Ultra 5 245HX supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6338 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 256 — 2300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 5 245HX) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6338). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 5 245HX) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6338) — the Xeon Gold 6338 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Arrow Lake-HX (Core Ultra 5 245HX) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6338).

Feature	Core Ultra 5 245HX	Xeon Gold 6338
Socket	FCBGA2114	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	6400+100%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	256	6144+2300%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	64+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 5 245HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6338 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 5 245HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 6338 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 245HX rivals Ryzen 7 8845HS; Xeon Gold 6338 rivals EPYC 7543.