PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 245K vs Xeon Gold 6330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 245K vs Xeon Gold 6330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 245K

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,809 less on MSRP ($319 MSRP vs $2,128 MSRP).
✅Delivers 588.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 136.1 vs 19.8 PassMark/$ ($319 MSRP vs $2,128 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 205W, a 80W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 42 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6330, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6330

2021

Why buy it

✅+75% larger total L3 cache (42 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 245K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (42,072 vs 43,417).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.8 vs 136.1 PassMark/$ ($2,128 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).
❌64% higher power demand at 205W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 245K moves to LGA1851 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 245K better than Xeon Gold 6330?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6330 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 5 245K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 5 245K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 20.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 245K is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.2% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 14 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 5 245K is the better buy right now. Core Ultra 5 245K comes in $1,809 cheaper on MSRP at $319 MSRP versus $2,128 MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 588.4% better value on MSRP (136.1 vs 19.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 245K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1851 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 14 threads instead of 28/56. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 5 245K vs Xeon Gold 6330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 245K

The Core Ultra 5 245K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 43,417 points. Launch price was $319.

Xeon Gold 6330

The Xeon Gold 6330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 42 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 42,072 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 245K packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6330 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Gold 6330 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245K versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6330 — a 50.6% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 245K (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 245K uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6330 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 245K scores 43,417 against the Xeon Gold 6330's 42,072 — a 3.1% lead for the Core Ultra 5 245K. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245K vs 42 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6330.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 245K	Xeon Gold 6330
Cores / Threads	14 / 14	28 / 56+100%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+68%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	4.2 GHz+110%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	42 MB (total)+75%
L2 Cache	3 MB (per core)+200%	1 MB (per core)
Process	3 nm-70%	10 nm
Architecture	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	43,417+3%	42,072

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 245K uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6330 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245K versus 2933 on the Xeon Gold 6330 — the Core Ultra 5 245K supports 118.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6330 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 192 — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 5 245K) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6330). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 5 245K) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6330) — the Xeon Gold 6330 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245K) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6330).

Feature	Core Ultra 5 245K	Xeon Gold 6330
Socket	LGA1851	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	6400+118%	2933
Max RAM Capacity	192	6144+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 5 245K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6330 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 5 245K includes integrated graphics (Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)), while the Xeon Gold 6330 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 245K rivals Ryzen 5 9600X; Xeon Gold 6330 rivals EPYC 7453.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 245K	Xeon Gold 6330
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core Ultra 5 245K was priced at $319, while the Xeon Gold 6330 came in at $2128. On launch pricing ($319 vs $2128), Core Ultra 5 245K was $1809 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 245K delivers 136.1 pts/$ vs 19.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6330 — making the Core Ultra 5 245K the 149.3% better value option.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 245K	Xeon Gold 6330
MSRP	$319-85%	$2128
Performance per Dollar	136.1+587%	19.8
Release Date	2024	2021

Search Core Ultra 5 245K on Amazon

Search Xeon Gold 6330 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.