
Core Ultra 7 255HX

Ryzen 7 3700X
Core Ultra 7 255HX vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 7 255HX vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 7 255HX vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 7 255HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2114 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Xe-LPG, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 49,765).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 255HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 255HX moves to FCBGA2114 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 255HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 255HX better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 255HX vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 255HX
The Core Ultra 7 255HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,765 points. Launch price was $450.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 255HX packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 255HX has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255HX versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255HX (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 255HX uses the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 255HX scores 49,765 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 75.7% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255HX. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 255HX vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20+150% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+18% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+50% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 32 MB+7% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+16967% |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-HX (2025) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 49,765+122% | 22,430 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,923 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,885 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 255HX uses the FCBGA2114 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 255HX versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Core Ultra 7 255HX supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 7 255HX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel HM870,Intel WM880 (Core Ultra 7 255HX) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2114 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+100% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core Ultra 7 255HX) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The Core Ultra 7 255HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Xe-LPG), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 255HX rivals Ryzen 9 9850HX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Xe-LPG | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













