
Core Ultra 7 265K vs EPYC 7513

Core Ultra 7 265K

EPYC 7513
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265K
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7513
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265K | EPYC 7513 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($285) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($389) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265K | EPYC 7513 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+34%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($285) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($389) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265K and EPYC 7513

Core Ultra 7 265K
The Core Ultra 7 265K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,789 points. Launch price was $394.

EPYC 7513
The EPYC 7513 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.65 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,745 points. Launch price was $2,840.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265K packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 7513 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7513 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265K versus 3.65 GHz on the EPYC 7513 — a 40.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265K (base: 3.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265K uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the EPYC 7513 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265K scores 58,789 against the EPYC 7513's 59,745 — a 1.6% lead for the EPYC 7513. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265K vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7513.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265K | EPYC 7513 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20 | 32 / 64+60% |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+51% | 3.65 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+50% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+327% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+500% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 58,789 | 59,745+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 36,309 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,283 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 22,293 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265K uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7513 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265K versus 3200 on the EPYC 7513 — the EPYC 7513 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7513 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 265K) vs 8 (EPYC 7513). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 7 265K) vs 128 (EPYC 7513) — the EPYC 7513 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1851 (Core Ultra 7 265K) and SP3 (EPYC 7513).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265K | EPYC 7513 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | 3200+63900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+6553500% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 7 265K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core Ultra 7 265K supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 7 265K includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics 64EU), while the EPYC 7513 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7513 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265K | EPYC 7513 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Arc Graphics 64EU | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 7 265K launched at $309 MSRP, while the EPYC 7513 debuted at $2840. At current prices ($285 vs $389), the Core Ultra 7 265K is $104 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 265K delivers 206.3 pts/$ vs 153.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 7513 — making the Core Ultra 7 265K the 29.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265K | EPYC 7513 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $309-89% | $2840 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $285-27% | $389 |
| Performance per Dollar | 206.3+34% | 153.6 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















