
Core Ultra 7 265K vs Xeon W-3375

Core Ultra 7 265K

Xeon W-3375
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265K
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3375
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265K | Xeon W-3375 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($285) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,000) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-W (2021) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265K | Xeon W-3375 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1995%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($285) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,000) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265K and Xeon W-3375

Core Ultra 7 265K
The Core Ultra 7 265K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,789 points. Launch price was $394.

Xeon W-3375
The Xeon W-3375 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,091 points. Launch price was $4,499.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265K packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon W-3375 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon W-3375 has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265K versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3375 — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265K (base: 3.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265K uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon W-3375 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265K scores 58,789 against the Xeon W-3375's 59,091 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W-3375. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,283 vs 1,818, a 57.4% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 22,293 vs 17,713 (22.9% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265K vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3375.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265K | Xeon W-3375 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20 | 38 / 76+90% |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+38% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+56% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 57 MB (total)+90% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+200% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-70% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Ice Lake-W (2021) |
| PassMark | 58,789 | 59,091 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 36,309 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,283+81% | 1,818 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 22,293+26% | 17,713 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265K uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3375 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265K versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon W-3375 — the Core Ultra 7 265K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3375 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 265K) vs 8 (Xeon W-3375). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 7 265K) vs 64 (Xeon W-3375) — the Xeon W-3375 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1851 (Core Ultra 7 265K) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3375).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265K | Xeon W-3375 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 4096 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 64+220% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 7 265K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265K) vs true (Xeon W-3375). The Core Ultra 7 265K includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics 64EU), while the Xeon W-3375 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3375 rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265K | Xeon W-3375 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Arc Graphics 64EU | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 7 265K launched at $309 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3375 debuted at $4951. At current prices ($285 vs $6000), the Core Ultra 7 265K is $5715 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 265K delivers 206.3 pts/$ vs 9.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3375 — making the Core Ultra 7 265K the 181.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265K | Xeon W-3375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $309-94% | $4951 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $285-95% | $6000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 206.3+2005% | 9.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















