Core Ultra 7 265U
VS
EPYC 7232P

Core Ultra 7 265U vs EPYC 7232P

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265U

12 Cores14 Thrd14 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2025
VS
AMD

EPYC 7232P

8 Cores16 Thrd120 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265U

#144
Core i7-12650H
MSRP: $457|Avg: N/A
102%
#147
Core Ultra 7 265U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
98%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
95%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
94%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7232P

#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
102%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
100%
#116
EPYC 7232P
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
99%
#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
94%
#131
EPYC 74F3
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core Ultra 7 265U (2025) utilizes 5 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore Ultra 7 265UEPYC 7232P
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-U (2025) / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The EPYC 7232P (2019) relies on 7 nm, 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Eight-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore Ultra 7 265UEPYC 7232P
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265U and EPYC 7232P

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265U

The Core Ultra 7 265U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,900 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

EPYC 7232P

The EPYC 7232P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,712 points. Launch price was $450.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 265U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the EPYC 7232P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265U versus 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7232P — a 49.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265U uses the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 7232P uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265U scores 17,900 against the EPYC 7232P's 17,712 — a 1.1% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265U. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Core Ultra 7 265U vs 16 MB (total) on the EPYC 7232P.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265UEPYC 7232P
Cores / Threads
12 / 14+50%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.3 GHz+66%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz+29%
L3 Cache
12 MB
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
Process
5 nm-29%
7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-U (2025)
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark
17,900+1%
17,712
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 265U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7232P uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265UEPYC 7232P
Socket
FCBGA2049
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0