Core Ultra 7 265U
VS
Ryzen 7 4800HS

Core Ultra 7 265U vs Ryzen 7 4800HS

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265U

12 Cores14 Thrd14 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2025
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 4800HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265U

#144
Core i7-12650H
MSRP: $457|Avg: N/A
102%
#147
Core Ultra 7 265U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
98%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
95%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
94%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 4800HS

#144
Core i7-12650H
MSRP: $457|Avg: N/A
106%
#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
101%
#156
Ryzen 7 4800HS
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
99%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
97%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
97%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
93%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core Ultra 7 265U leads in gaming performance. However, the Ryzen 7 4800HS is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore Ultra 7 265URyzen 7 4800HS
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-U (2025) / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore Ultra 7 265URyzen 7 4800HS
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265U and Ryzen 7 4800HS

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265U

The Core Ultra 7 265U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,900 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 7 4800HS

The Ryzen 7 4800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,016 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 265U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 7 4800HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265U versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 7 4800HS — a 23.2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265U uses the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 4800HS uses Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265U scores 17,900 against the Ryzen 7 4800HS's 18,016 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 4800HS. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Core Ultra 7 265U vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 4800HS.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265URyzen 7 4800HS
Cores / Threads
12 / 14+50%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.3 GHz+26%
4.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz+21%
L3 Cache
12 MB+50%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
Process
5 nm-29%
7 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-U (2025)
Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020)
PassMark
17,900
18,016
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 265U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 4800HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265URyzen 7 4800HS
Socket
FCBGA2049
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0