Core Ultra 7 265U
VS
Xeon Phi 7290

Core Ultra 7 265U vs Xeon Phi 7290

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265U

12 Cores14 Thrd14 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon Phi 7290

72 Cores288 Thrd245 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265U

#144
Core i7-12650H
MSRP: $457|Avg: N/A
102%
#147
Core Ultra 7 265U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
98%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
95%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
94%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Phi 7290

#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
103%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
103%
#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
102%
#113
Xeon Phi 7290
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
100%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core Ultra 7 265U (2025) utilizes 5 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore Ultra 7 265UXeon Phi 7290
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-U (2025) / 5 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Knights Landing (2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon Phi 7290 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore Ultra 7 265UXeon Phi 7290
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265U and Xeon Phi 7290

Intel

Core Ultra 7 265U

The Core Ultra 7 265U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,900 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon Phi 7290

The Xeon Phi 7290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 72 cores and 288 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 245 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,839 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 265U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7290 offers 72 cores / 288 threads — the Xeon Phi 7290 has 60 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265U versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7290 — a 102.9% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265U uses the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265U scores 17,900 against the Xeon Phi 7290's 17,839 — a 0.3% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265U. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Core Ultra 7 265U vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7290.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265UXeon Phi 7290
Cores / Threads
12 / 14
72 / 288+500%
Boost Clock
5.3 GHz+212%
1.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+60%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB
0 kB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
Process
5 nm-64%
14 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-U (2025)
Knights Landing (2016)
PassMark
17,900
17,839
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 265U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 265UXeon Phi 7290
Socket
FCBGA2049
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0