Core Ultra 9 275HX
VS
Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Intel

Core Ultra 9 275HX

24 Cores24 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025
VS
AMD

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

16 Cores32 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 275HX

#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
117%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
107%
#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
102%
#43
Core Ultra 9 275HX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
96%
#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core Ultra 9 275HX delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 in both compute-intensive tasks (1.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore Ultra 9 275HXRyzen AI Max+ 395
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-HX (2025) / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore Ultra 9 275HXRyzen AI Max+ 395
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 9 275HX and Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Intel

Core Ultra 9 275HX

The Core Ultra 9 275HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 56,018 points. Launch price was $600.

AMD

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 55,025 points. Launch price was $450.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 9 275HX packs 24 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core Ultra 9 275HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 275HX versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 275HX (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 275HX uses the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 275HX scores 56,018 against the Ryzen AI Max+ 395's 55,025 — a 1.8% lead for the Core Ultra 9 275HX. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 275HX vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395.

FeatureCore Ultra 9 275HXRyzen AI Max+ 395
Cores / Threads
24 / 24+50%
16 / 32
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+6%
5.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
3 GHz+11%
L3 Cache
36 MB (total)
64 MB (total)+78%
L2 Cache
3 MB (per core)+200%
1 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm-25%
4 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-HX (2025)
Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark
56,018+2%
55,025
Geekbench 6 Single
2,835
Geekbench 6 Multi
17,908
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 9 275HX uses the FCBGA2114 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 275HX versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 9 275HX supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) vs 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) — the Core Ultra 9 275HX offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) and FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395).

FeatureCore Ultra 9 275HXRyzen AI Max+ 395
Socket
FCBGA2114
FP11
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400
8000+159900%
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+209715100%
128
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
24+50%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 9 275HX) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ 395). Both include integrated graphics Intel Arc Graphics (Core Ultra 9 275HX) and AMD Radeon 8060S (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 275HX targets High-End Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 275HX rivals Ryzen 9 9955HX; Ryzen AI Max+ 395 rivals Core Ultra 9 285HX.

FeatureCore Ultra 9 275HXRyzen AI Max+ 395
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics
AMD Radeon 8060S
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
Target Use
High-End Gaming Laptop