Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395 Performance Spectrum

Core Ultra 9 275HX

24 / 24

56,018

+1.8%

55,025

0.0%

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 9 275HX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

2025

Why buy it

✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 9 275HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (55,025 vs 56,018).

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 9 275HX better than Ryzen AI Max+ 395?

Yes. Core Ultra 9 275HX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 9 275HX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 9 275HX is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 9 275HX still makes the most sense overall. Core Ultra 9 275HX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 9 275HX

The Core Ultra 9 275HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 56,018 points. Launch price was $600.

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 55,025 points. Launch price was $450.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 9 275HX packs 24 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core Ultra 9 275HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 275HX versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 275HX (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 275HX uses the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 275HX scores 56,018 against the Ryzen AI Max+ 395's 55,025 — a 1.8% lead for the Core Ultra 9 275HX. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 275HX vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395.

Feature	Core Ultra 9 275HX	Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Cores / Threads	24 / 24+50%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+6%	5.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+78%
L2 Cache	3 MB (per core)+200%	1 MB (per core)
Process	3 nm-25%	4 nm
Architecture	Arrow Lake-HX (2025)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	56,018+2%	55,025
Geekbench 6 Single	2,835	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	17,908	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 9 275HX uses the FCBGA2114 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 275HX versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 9 275HX supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) vs 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) — the Core Ultra 9 275HX offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) and FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395).

Feature	Core Ultra 9 275HX	Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Socket	FCBGA2114	FP11
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400	8000+25%
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB+100%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24+50%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 9 275HX) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ 395). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc Graphics (Core Ultra 9 275HX) and AMD Radeon 8060S (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 275HX targets High-End Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 275HX rivals Ryzen 9 9955HX; Ryzen AI Max+ 395 rivals Core Ultra 9 285HX.

Feature	Core Ultra 9 275HX	Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel Arc Graphics	AMD Radeon 8060S
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
Target Use	High-End Gaming Laptop	—