Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Xeon E7-8895 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Xeon E7-8895 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Xeon E7-8895 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 9 275HX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 155W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2114 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA2011 and older memory support.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics, while Xeon E7-8895 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (56,018 vs 57,165).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8895 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E7-8895 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅+2% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 9 275HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $6,841 MSRP, while Core Ultra 9 275HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌181.8% higher power demand at 155W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on FCLGA2011, while Core Ultra 9 275HX moves to FCBGA2114 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 9 275HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 9 275HX better than Xeon E7-8895 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7-8895 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 9 275HX is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-8895 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2% better PassMark, backed by 15 cores and 30 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 9 275HX is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E7-8895 v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core Ultra 9 275HX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $6,841 MSRP, and it still gives you a 32.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E7-8895 v2 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2% better PassMark. Xeon E7-8895 v2 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 9 275HX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2014) and a healthier platform with FCBGA2114 and DDR5 instead of FCLGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Xeon E7-8895 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 9 275HX

The Core Ultra 9 275HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 56,018 points. Launch price was $600.

Xeon E7-8895 v2

The Xeon E7-8895 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2014-02-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 57,165 points. Launch price was $6,841.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 9 275HX packs 24 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon E7-8895 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the Core Ultra 9 275HX has 9 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 275HX versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E7-8895 v2 — a 40% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 275HX (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 275HX is built on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 275HX scores 56,018 against the Xeon E7-8895 v2's 57,165 — a 2% lead for the Xeon E7-8895 v2. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 275HX vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-8895 v2.

Feature	Core Ultra 9 275HX	Xeon E7-8895 v2
Cores / Threads	24 / 24+60%	15 / 30
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+50%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	2.8 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	37.5 MB+4%
L2 Cache	3 MB (per core)	—
Process	3 nm-86%	22 nm
Architecture	Arrow Lake-HX (2025)	—
PassMark	56,018	57,165+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,835	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	17,908	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 9 275HX uses the FCBGA2114 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E7-8895 v2 uses FCLGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 275HX versus 1600 on the Xeon E7-8895 v2 — the Core Ultra 9 275HX supports 300% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-8895 v2 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) vs 4 (Xeon E7-8895 v2). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) vs 40 (Xeon E7-8895 v2) — the Xeon E7-8895 v2 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) and C602-J (Xeon E7-8895 v2).

Feature	Core Ultra 9 275HX	Xeon E7-8895 v2
Socket	FCBGA2114	FCLGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400+300%	1600
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	1536 GB+500%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	40+67%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 9 275HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 9 275HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the Xeon E7-8895 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 275HX targets High-End Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 275HX rivals Ryzen 9 9955HX; Xeon E7-8895 v2 rivals AMD Opteron 6386 SE.