
Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Core Ultra 9 275HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 275HX
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($85) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-HX (2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($85) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 9 275HX and Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Core Ultra 9 275HX
The Core Ultra 9 275HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 56,018 points. Launch price was $600.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 54,763 points. Launch price was $1,399.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 9 275HX packs 24 cores / 24 threads, matching the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X's 24 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 275HX versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 275HX (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 275HX uses the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 275HX scores 56,018 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X's 54,763 — a 2.3% lead for the Core Ultra 9 275HX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,835 vs 1,270, a 76.2% lead for the Core Ultra 9 275HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 275HX vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 24 | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+20% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz+41% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 128 MB+256% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+500% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-HX (2025) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 56,018+2% | 54,763 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 34,260 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,835+123% | 1,270 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,908 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 9 275HX uses the FCBGA2114 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 275HX versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X — the Core Ultra 9 275HX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 256 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) and AMD TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X).
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2114 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 88+267% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 9 275HX) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X). The Core Ultra 9 275HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 275HX targets High-End Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 275HX rivals Ryzen 9 9955HX; Ryzen Threadripper 3960X rivals Core i9-10900X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | High-End Gaming Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















