
Core Ultra 9 285T vs Xeon Gold 6330N

Core Ultra 9 285T

Xeon Gold 6330N
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 285T
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 6330N
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 9 285T | Xeon Gold 6330N |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($549) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,798) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Legacy / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 9 285T | Xeon Gold 6330N |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+233%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($549) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,798) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 9 285T and Xeon Gold 6330N

Core Ultra 9 285T
The Core Ultra 9 285T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 36,916 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon Gold 6330N
The Xeon Gold 6330N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 42 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 36,360 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 9 285T packs 24 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6330N offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Gold 6330N has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285T versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6330N — a 45.5% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285T (base: 1.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 285T is built on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 285T scores 36,916 against the Xeon Gold 6330N's 36,360 — a 1.5% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285T. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285T vs 42 MB on the Xeon Gold 6330N.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285T | Xeon Gold 6330N |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 24 | 28 / 56+17% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+59% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz+57% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 42 MB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 3 nm-70% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | — |
| PassMark | 36,916+2% | 36,360 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 9 285T uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6330N uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285T versus 2667 on the Xeon Gold 6330N — the Core Ultra 9 285T supports 82.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6330N supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 256 — 184% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 9 285T) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6330N). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 9 285T) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6330N) — the Xeon Gold 6330N offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 9 285T) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6330N).
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285T | Xeon Gold 6330N |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+140% | 2667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 6144+2300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 64+220% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6330N supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 9 285T includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 6330N requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 285T rivals Ryzen 9 7900; Xeon Gold 6330N rivals EPYC 7413.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285T | Xeon Gold 6330N |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 9 285T launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6330N debuted at $2389. At current prices ($549 vs $1798), the Core Ultra 9 285T is $1249 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 9 285T delivers 67.2 pts/$ vs 20.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6330N — making the Core Ultra 9 285T the 107.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285T | Xeon Gold 6330N |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-77% | $2389 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $549-69% | $1798 |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.2+233% | 20.2 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















