E-300 vs Pentium T4400

E-300 vs Pentium T4400 Performance Spectrum

E-300

2 / 2

1,176

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium T4400

1,175

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E-300 vs Pentium T4400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E-300 vs Pentium T4400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E-300

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $47 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Delivers 78.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.6 vs 11.0 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Draws 18W instead of 35W, a 17W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6310, while Pentium T4400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium T4400

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,175 vs 1,176).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.0 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
❌94.4% higher power demand at 35W vs 18W.
❌No integrated graphics, while E-300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is E-300 better than Pentium T4400?

Yes. E-300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, E-300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E-300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E-300 is the better buy right now. E-300 comes in $47 cheaper on MSRP at $60 MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 78.5% better value on MSRP (19.6 vs 11.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E-300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

E-300 vs Pentium T4400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E-300

The E-300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,176 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium T4400

The Pentium T4400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The E-300 is built on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the E-300 scores 1,176 against the Pentium T4400's 1,175 — a 0.1% lead for the E-300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E-300 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T4400.

Feature	E-300	Pentium T4400
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	1.3 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	40 nm-11%	45 nm
Architecture	Zacate (2011−2013)	—
PassMark	1,176	1,175
Geekbench 6 Single	—	249

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E-300 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium T4400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the E-300 versus DDR3-800 on the Pentium T4400 — the E-300 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (E-300) vs 2 (Pentium T4400). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.

Feature	E-300	Pentium T4400
Socket	FT1	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066+33%	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (E-300) vs None (Pentium T4400). The E-300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6310), while the Pentium T4400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: E-300 targets Budget Mobile, Pentium T4400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Pentium T4400 rivals AMD A4-3300M.

Feature	E-300	Pentium T4400
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 6310	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	None
Target Use	Budget Mobile	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the E-300 was priced at $60, while the Pentium T4400 came in at $107. On launch pricing ($60 vs $107), E-300 was $47 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the E-300 delivers 19.6 pts/$ vs 11.0 pts/$ for the Pentium T4400 — making the E-300 the 56.4% better value option.

Feature	E-300	Pentium T4400
MSRP	$60-44%	$107
Performance per Dollar	19.6+78%	11.0
Release Date	2011	2009

Search E-300 on Amazon

Search Pentium T4400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.