E-300
VS
Pentium T4400

E-300 vs Pentium T4400

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E-300 is positioned at rank 891 and the Pentium T4400 is on rank 1054, so the E-300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E-300

#879
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1497%
#880
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1475%
#881
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1354%
#882
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1348%
#883
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1336%
#885
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1290%
#886
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1237%
#887
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1235%
#888
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1202%
#891
E-300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
100%
#892
Core i7-7820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#895
Pentium B940
MSRP: $134|Avg: $11
99%
#896
Core i5-8305G
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
99%
#897
Celeron 6305
MSRP: $107|Avg: $80
99%
#900
Core i7-8705G
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#902
Pentium Dual Core T2410
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
97%
#903
FX-8800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
96%
#904
Core i7-8809G
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium T4400

#1042
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2672%
#1043
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2633%
#1044
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2417%
#1045
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2406%
#1046
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2384%
#1048
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2302%
#1049
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2208%
#1050
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2204%
#1051
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2145%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
100%
#1056
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
99%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
98%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
98%
#1059
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
97%
#1060
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
97%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
97%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1063
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
96%
#1064
Celeron P4500
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
96%
#1065
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
96%
#1066
Processor N50
MSRP: $128|Avg: $120
95%
#1067
Athlon II N350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
95%
#1068
Celeron N3350
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The E-300 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium T4400 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightE-300Pentium T4400
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Pentium T4400 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $5 (vs $20), it costs 75% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 300% higher cost efficiency score compared to the E-300.
InsightE-300Pentium T4400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+300%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E-300 and Pentium T4400

AMD

E-300

The E-300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,176 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium T4400

The Pentium T4400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The E-300 is built on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the E-300 scores 1,176 against the Pentium T4400's 1,175 — a 0.1% lead for the E-300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E-300 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T4400.

FeatureE-300Pentium T4400
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
Process
40 nm-11%
45 nm
Architecture
Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,176
1,175
Geekbench 6 Single
249
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E-300 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium T4400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (E-300) vs 2 (Pentium T4400). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.

FeatureE-300Pentium T4400
Socket
FT1
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (E-300) vs None (Pentium T4400). The E-300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6310), while the Pentium T4400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: E-300 targets Budget Mobile, Pentium T4400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Pentium T4400 rivals AMD A4-3300M.

FeatureE-300Pentium T4400
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6310
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
None
Target Use
Budget Mobile
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The E-300 launched at $60 MSRP, while the Pentium T4400 debuted at $107. At current prices ($20 vs $5), the Pentium T4400 is $15 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the E-300 delivers 58.8 pts/$ vs 235.0 pts/$ for the Pentium T4400 — making the Pentium T4400 the 119.9% better value option.

FeatureE-300Pentium T4400
MSRP
$60-44%
$107
Avg Price (30d)
$20
$5-75%
Performance per Dollar
58.8
235.0+300%
Release Date
2011
2009