E-350
VS
Core 2 Duo E7400

E-350 vs Core 2 Duo E7400

AMD

E-350

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E7400

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E-350 is positioned at rank 854 and the Core 2 Duo E7400 is on rank 544, so the Core 2 Duo E7400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E-350

#842
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1398%
#843
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1378%
#844
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1265%
#845
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1259%
#846
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1248%
#848
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1205%
#849
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1155%
#850
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1153%
#851
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1122%
#854
E-350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#856
Ryzen Embedded R1305G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
100%
#863
Pentium Dual Core T2390
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
98%
#867
Core i7-1160G7
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E7400

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8965%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
8471%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6151%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1853%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1468%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1284%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
735%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
726%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
661%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
661%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
653%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
636%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
627%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
624%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
619%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
99%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
99%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
95%
#544
Core 2 Duo E7400
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#545
Athlon 5370
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
100%
#548
Core i3-6100
MSRP: $125|Avg: $30
98%
#549
Core i3-6300T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
98%
#550
Core i3-6098P
MSRP: $117|Avg: $59
98%
#551
Core i7-7800X
MSRP: $383|Avg: $254
97%
#552
Core i3-7101TE
MSRP: $117|Avg: $60
97%
#555
FX-8320E
MSRP: $147|Avg: $60
97%
#556
Pentium G3260
MSRP: $64|Avg: $21
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 2 Duo E7400 leads in gaming performance. However, the E-350 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightE-350Core 2 Duo E7400
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightE-350Core 2 Duo E7400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E-350 and Core 2 Duo E7400

AMD

E-350

The E-350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E7400

The Core 2 Duo E7400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,043 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the E-350 and Core 2 Duo E7400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the E-350 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7400 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E7400. The E-350 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E7400 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the E-350 scores 1,049 against the Core 2 Duo E7400's 1,043 — a 0.6% lead for the E-350. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureE-350Core 2 Duo E7400
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
2.8 GHz+75%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
3 MB (total)+500%
Process
40 nm-11%
45 nm
Architecture
Zacate (2011−2013)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,049
1,043
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E-350 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E7400 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE-350Core 2 Duo E7400
Socket
FT1
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1066
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E-350) / true (Core 2 Duo E7400). Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E7400 rivals Athlon II X2 245.

FeatureE-350Core 2 Duo E7400
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true