E-350
VS
Pentium 3558U

E-350 vs Pentium 3558U

AMD

E-350

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Pentium 3558U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E-350 is positioned at rank 854 and the Pentium 3558U is on rank 1123, so the E-350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E-350

#842
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1398%
#843
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1378%
#844
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1265%
#845
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1259%
#846
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1248%
#848
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1205%
#849
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1155%
#850
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1153%
#851
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1122%
#854
E-350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#856
Ryzen Embedded R1305G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
100%
#863
Pentium Dual Core T2390
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
98%
#867
Core i7-1160G7
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 3558U

#1111
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3522%
#1112
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3471%
#1113
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3186%
#1114
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3172%
#1115
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3143%
#1117
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3035%
#1118
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2910%
#1119
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2905%
#1120
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2827%
#1123
Pentium 3558U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1124
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
99%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
99%
#1127
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
99%
#1128
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
99%
#1129
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
99%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
98%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
98%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1134
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
97%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
93%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
93%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
93%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium 3558U leads in gaming performance. However, the E-350 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightE-350Pentium 3558U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightE-350Pentium 3558U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E-350 and Pentium 3558U

AMD

E-350

The E-350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium 3558U

The Pentium 3558U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,041 points. Launch price was $161.

Processing Power

Both the E-350 and Pentium 3558U share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the E-350 versus 1.7 GHz on the Pentium 3558U — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Pentium 3558U. The E-350 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Pentium 3558U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the E-350 scores 1,049 against the Pentium 3558U's 1,041 — a 0.8% lead for the E-350. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E-350 vs 2 MB on the Pentium 3558U.

FeatureE-350Pentium 3558U
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
1.7 GHz+6%
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512 kB
Process
40 nm
22 nm-45%
Architecture
Zacate (2011−2013)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,049
1,041
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E-350 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 3558U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE-350Pentium 3558U
Socket
FT1
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%