Celeron T3500 vs E-350
Celeron T3500
E-350
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron T3500 is positioned at rank 1015 and the E-350 is on rank 854, so the E-350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron T3500
Performance Per Dollar E-350
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron T3500 | E-350 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron T3500 | E-350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+51%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron T3500 and E-350
Celeron T3500
The Celeron T3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $69.
E-350
The E-350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The E-350 is built on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron T3500 scores 1,055 against the E-350's 1,049 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron T3500. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron T3500 vs 0 kB on the E-350.
| Feature | Celeron T3500 | E-350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | — | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | — | 1.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | — | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 40 nm-11% |
| Architecture | — | Zacate (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,055 | 1,049 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron T3500 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the E-350 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron T3500 | E-350 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | FT1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The Celeron T3500 launched at $80 MSRP, while the E-350 debuted at $50. At current prices ($10 vs $15), the Celeron T3500 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron T3500 delivers 105.5 pts/$ vs 69.9 pts/$ for the E-350 — making the Celeron T3500 the 40.5% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron T3500 | E-350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80 | $50-38% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-33% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 105.5+51% | 69.9 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron T3500 and E-350
