Celeron T3500 vs E1-2500

Celeron T3500 vs E1-2500 Performance Spectrum

Celeron T3500

1,055

+0.3%

Core Duo T2050

Celeron N3000

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

1,052

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron T3500 vs E1-2500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron T3500 vs E1-2500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron T3500

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while E1-2500 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

E1-2500

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,052 vs 1,055).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron T3500 better than E1-2500?

Yes. Celeron T3500 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron T3500 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron T3500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron T3500 is the better buy right now. Celeron T3500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $80 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E1-2500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron T3500 vs E1-2500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron T3500

The Celeron T3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $69.

E1-2500

The E1-2500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,052 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The E1-2500 is built on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron T3500 scores 1,055 against the E1-2500's 1,052 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron T3500. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron T3500 vs 0 kB on the E1-2500.

Feature	Celeron T3500	E1-2500
Cores / Threads	—	2 / 2
Boost Clock	—	1.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	—
L3 Cache	1 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	1024 kB
Process	45 nm	28 nm-38%
Architecture	—	Kabini (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,055	1,052

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron T3500 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the E1-2500 uses FT3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.