Celeron T3500 vs E-450

Celeron T3500 vs E-450 Performance Spectrum

Celeron T3500

1,055

0.0%

Core Duo T2050

Celeron N3000

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

1,063

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron T3500 vs E-450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron T3500 vs E-450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron T3500

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than E-450 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,055 vs 1,063).
❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while E-450 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌94.4% higher power demand at 35W vs 18W.

E-450

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 18W instead of 35W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is E-450 better than Celeron T3500?

Yes. E-450 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, E-450 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E-450 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E-450 is still the much better call for a fresh build. E-450 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron T3500 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (13.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E-450 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2010). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron T3500 vs E-450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron T3500

The Celeron T3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $69.

E-450

The E-450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.65 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,063 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The E-450 is built on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron T3500 scores 1,055 against the E-450's 1,063 — a 0.8% lead for the E-450. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron T3500 vs 0 kB on the E-450.

Feature	Celeron T3500	E-450
Cores / Threads	—	2 / 2
Boost Clock	—	1.65 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	—
L3 Cache	1 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	512K (per core)
Process	45 nm	40 nm-11%
Architecture	—	Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,055	1,063