Athlon X2 BE-2400 vs E-350

Athlon X2 BE-2400 vs E-350 Performance Spectrum

Athlon X2 BE-2400

2 / 2

1,050

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

E-350

2 / 2

1,049

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X2 BE-2400 vs E-350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X2 BE-2400 vs E-350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X2 BE-2400

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.5 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌150% higher power demand at 45W vs 18W.

E-350

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
✅Delivers 19.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.0 vs 17.5 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
✅Draws 18W instead of 45W, a 27W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,049 vs 1,050).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X2 BE-2400 better than E-350?

Yes. Athlon X2 BE-2400 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon X2 BE-2400 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X2 BE-2400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X2 BE-2400 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Athlon X2 BE-2400 comes in 20.0% more expensive on MSRP at $60 MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. E-350 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.1% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E-350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon X2 BE-2400 vs E-350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X2 BE-2400

The Athlon X2 BE-2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,050 points. Launch price was $149.

E-350

The E-350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X2 BE-2400 and E-350 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Athlon X2 BE-2400 versus 1.6 GHz on the E-350 — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 BE-2400. The Athlon X2 BE-2400 uses the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the E-350 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 BE-2400 scores 1,050 against the E-350's 1,049 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon X2 BE-2400. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon X2 BE-2400	E-350
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz+44%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512K (per core)
Process	65 nm	40 nm-38%
Architecture	Brisbane (2007−2008)	Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,050	1,049

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X2 BE-2400 uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E-350 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon X2 BE-2400	E-350
Socket	AM2	FT1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon X2 BE-2400 was priced at $60, while the E-350 came in at $50. On launch pricing ($60 vs $50), E-350 was $10 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X2 BE-2400 delivers 17.5 pts/$ vs 21.0 pts/$ for the E-350 — making the E-350 the 18.1% better value option.

Feature	Athlon X2 BE-2400	E-350
MSRP	$60	$50-17%
Performance per Dollar	17.5	21.0+20%
Release Date	2007	2011

Search Athlon X2 BE-2400 on Amazon

Search E-350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.