Athlon X2 BE-2400 vs Celeron N2940

Athlon X2 BE-2400 vs Celeron N2940 Performance Spectrum

Athlon X2 BE-2400

2 / 2

1,050

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N2940

4 / 4

1,054

+0.4%

Core Duo T2050

Celeron N3000

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X2 BE-2400 vs Celeron N2940 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X2 BE-2400 vs Celeron N2940: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X2 BE-2400

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,050 vs 1,054).
❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while Celeron N2940 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌542.9% higher power demand at 45W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2940 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron N2940

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 7W instead of 45W, a 38W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Athlon X2 BE-2400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2940 better than Athlon X2 BE-2400?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X2 BE-2400 is ahead with 2.2% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2940 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2940 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2940 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N2940 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. Athlon X2 BE-2400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2007 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (17.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2940 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon X2 BE-2400 vs Celeron N2940 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X2 BE-2400

The Athlon X2 BE-2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,050 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron N2940

The Celeron N2940 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 2.25 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,054 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon X2 BE-2400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron N2940 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N2940 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Athlon X2 BE-2400 versus 2.25 GHz on the Celeron N2940 — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 BE-2400. The Athlon X2 BE-2400 uses the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron N2940 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 BE-2400 scores 1,050 against the Celeron N2940's 1,054 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron N2940. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon X2 BE-2400	Celeron N2940
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz+2%	2.25 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.83 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512K (per core)
Process	65 nm	22 nm-66%
Architecture	Brisbane (2007−2008)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,050	1,054
Geekbench 6 Single	—	240
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	850

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X2 BE-2400 uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron N2940 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon X2 BE-2400 versus DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron N2940 — the Celeron N2940 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X2 BE-2400 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon X2 BE-2400) vs 4 (Celeron N2940) — the Celeron N2940 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon X2 BE-2400) and SoC (Celeron N2940).

Feature	Athlon X2 BE-2400	Celeron N2940
Socket	AM2	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	DDR3L-1333+67%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon X2 BE-2400) / VT-x (Celeron N2940). The Celeron N2940 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Athlon X2 BE-2400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2940 targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron N2940 rivals AMD A6-6310.