Athlon X2 BE-2400 vs Atom Z2560

Athlon X2 BE-2400 vs Atom Z2560 Performance Spectrum

Athlon X2 BE-2400

2 / 2

1,050

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom Z2560

2 / 4

1,056

+0.6%

Core Duo T2050

Celeron N3000

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X2 BE-2400 vs Atom Z2560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X2 BE-2400 vs Atom Z2560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X2 BE-2400

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,050 vs 1,056).
❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while Atom Z2560 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1400% higher power demand at 45W vs 3W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom Z2560 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Atom Z2560

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 3W instead of 45W, a 42W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with PowerVR SGX544MP2, while Athlon X2 BE-2400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom Z2560 better than Athlon X2 BE-2400?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X2 BE-2400 is ahead with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z2560 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z2560 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom Z2560 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom Z2560 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. Athlon X2 BE-2400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2007 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (17.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom Z2560 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon X2 BE-2400 vs Atom Z2560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X2 BE-2400

The Athlon X2 BE-2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,050 points. Launch price was $149.

Atom Z2560

The Atom Z2560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Clovertrail (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FC-MB4760. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon X2 BE-2400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Atom Z2560's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Athlon X2 BE-2400 versus 1.6 GHz on the Atom Z2560 — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 BE-2400. The Athlon X2 BE-2400 uses the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Atom Z2560 uses Clovertrail (2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 BE-2400 scores 1,050 against the Atom Z2560's 1,056 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom Z2560. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon X2 BE-2400	Atom Z2560
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz+44%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512K (per core)
Process	65 nm	32 nm-51%
Architecture	Brisbane (2007−2008)	Clovertrail (2013)
PassMark	1,050	1,056

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X2 BE-2400 uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom Z2560 uses FC-MB4760 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon X2 BE-2400 versus LPDDR2-1066 on the Atom Z2560 — the Atom Z2560 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X2 BE-2400 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon X2 BE-2400) and Intel BGA1264 (Atom Z2560).

Feature	Athlon X2 BE-2400	Atom Z2560
Socket	AM2	FC-MB4760
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	LPDDR2-1066+33%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+700%	2 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0