Athlon X2 BE-2400 vs E1-2500

Athlon X2 BE-2400 vs E1-2500 Performance Spectrum

Athlon X2 BE-2400

2 / 2

1,050

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

E1-2500

2 / 2

1,052

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X2 BE-2400 vs E1-2500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X2 BE-2400 vs E1-2500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X2 BE-2400

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,050 vs 1,052).
❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while E1-2500 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.

E1-2500

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is E1-2500 better than Athlon X2 BE-2400?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X2 BE-2400 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, E1-2500 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E1-2500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E1-2500 is still the much better call for a fresh build. E1-2500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. Athlon X2 BE-2400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2007 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (17.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E1-2500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon X2 BE-2400 vs E1-2500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X2 BE-2400

The Athlon X2 BE-2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,050 points. Launch price was $149.

E1-2500

The E1-2500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,052 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X2 BE-2400 and E1-2500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Athlon X2 BE-2400 versus 1.4 GHz on the E1-2500 — a 48.6% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 BE-2400. The Athlon X2 BE-2400 uses the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the E1-2500 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 BE-2400 scores 1,050 against the E1-2500's 1,052 — a 0.2% lead for the E1-2500. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon X2 BE-2400	E1-2500
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz+64%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	1024 kB+100%
Process	65 nm	28 nm-57%
Architecture	Brisbane (2007−2008)	Kabini (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,050	1,052

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X2 BE-2400 uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E1-2500 uses FT3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.