E-450 vs Pentium E5500

E-450 vs Pentium E5500 Performance Spectrum

E-450

2 / 2

1,063

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium E5500

2 / 2

1,064

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E-450 vs Pentium E5500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E-450 vs Pentium E5500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E-450

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 18W instead of 65W, a 47W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,063 vs 1,064).

Pentium E5500

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $75 MSRP, while E-450 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌261.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 18W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium E5500 better than E-450?

Yes. Pentium E5500 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium E5500 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium E5500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium E5500 is the better buy right now. Pentium E5500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $75 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E-450 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

E-450 vs Pentium E5500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E-450

The E-450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.65 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,063 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium E5500

The Pentium E5500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 April 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,064 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the E-450 and Pentium E5500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.65 GHz on the E-450 versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium E5500 — a 51.7% clock advantage for the Pentium E5500. The E-450 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Pentium E5500 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the E-450 scores 1,063 against the Pentium E5500's 1,064 — a 0.1% lead for the Pentium E5500. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	E-450	Pentium E5500
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.65 GHz	2.8 GHz+70%
Base Clock	—	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB (total)
Process	40 nm-11%	45 nm
Architecture	Zacate (2011−2013)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,063	1,064