E1-2100
VS
Celeron G555

E1-2100 vs Celeron G555

AMD

E1-2100

2 Cores2 Thrd9 WWMax: 1 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron G555

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E1-2100 is positioned at rank 719 and the Celeron G555 is on rank 634, so the Celeron G555 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E1-2100

#706
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1022%
#707
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1007%
#708
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
925%
#709
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
921%
#710
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
912%
#712
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
881%
#713
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
845%
#714
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
843%
#715
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
821%
#719
E1-2100
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G555

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11360%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10734%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7794%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2348%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1860%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1627%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
932%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
920%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
837%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
837%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
828%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
806%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
794%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
791%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
784%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#634
Celeron G555
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
100%
#635
Celeron G530
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
100%
#636
Core i3-7350K
MSRP: $179|Avg: $45
99%
#637
FX-4130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
99%
#638
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#639
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#640
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
99%
#641
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
99%
#642
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
98%
#645
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
98%
#646
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
97%
#647
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
97%
#648
Pentium G2020
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
97%
#649
Pentium G3450
MSRP: $82|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron G555 leads in gaming performance. However, the E1-2100 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightE1-2100Celeron G555
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Kabini (2013−2014) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightE1-2100Celeron G555
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E1-2100 and Celeron G555

AMD

E1-2100

The E1-2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,435 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Celeron G555

The Celeron G555 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,427 points. Launch price was $89.

Processing Power

Both the E1-2100 and Celeron G555 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the E1-2100 versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G555 — a 91.9% clock advantage for the Celeron G555. The E1-2100 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron G555 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the E1-2100 scores 1,435 against the Celeron G555's 1,427 — a 0.6% lead for the E1-2100. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E1-2100 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G555.

FeatureE1-2100Celeron G555
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1 GHz
2.7 GHz+170%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1024 kB+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Kabini (2013−2014)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,435
1,427
Geekbench 6 Single
398
Geekbench 6 Multi
742
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1-2100 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G555 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE1-2100Celeron G555
Socket
FT3
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E1-2100) / VT-x (Celeron G555). The Celeron G555 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the E1-2100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G555 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G555 rivals Pentium G630.

FeatureE1-2100Celeron G555
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Desktop