Radeon 2100 vs FirePro 3D V8750
Radeon 2100
Popular choices:
FirePro 3D V8750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 2100 is positioned at rank 725 and the FirePro 3D V8750 is on rank 370, so the FirePro 3D V8750 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 2100
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V8750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 2100 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon 2100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 3D V8750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V8750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2020% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 2100.
| Insight | Radeon 2100 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2020%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2020%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (254mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V8750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $500 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 107.8% better value per dollar than the Radeon 2100.
| Insight | Radeon 2100 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+107.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 2100 and FirePro 3D V8750
Radeon 2100
The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
FirePro 3D V8750
The FirePro 3D V8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,272 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon 2100 scores 60 versus the FirePro 3D V8750's 1,272 — the FirePro 3D V8750 leads by 2020%. The Radeon 2100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the FirePro 3D V8750 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 2100) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8750). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8750).
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 60 | 1,272+2020% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2048+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS+343% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 512 KB+433% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 768 KB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 2100 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V8750 has 2 GB. The FirePro 3D V8750 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon 2100) vs 768 KB (FirePro 3D V8750) — the FirePro 3D V8750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 768 KB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0b (Radeon 2100) vs 10.1 (FirePro 3D V8750). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0b | 10.1+12% |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 3.2+60% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon 2100) vs UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V8750). Decoder: Avivo vs UVD 2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (Radeon 2100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V8750).
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo | UVD 2 |
| Decoder | Avivo | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 2100 draws 50W versus the FirePro 3D V8750's 274W — a 138.3% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 2100) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V8750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-82% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 254mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.2 | 4.6+283% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 2100 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the FirePro 3D V8750 launched at $1799 and now averages $500. The Radeon 2100 costs 90.2% less ($451 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.2 (Radeon 2100) vs 2.5 (FirePro 3D V8750) — the FirePro 3D V8750 offers 108.3% better value. The Radeon 2100 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | FirePro 3D V8750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-92% | $1799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-90% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 2.5+108% |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | Tahiti |
| Release | May 13 2019 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #898 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 2100 and FirePro 3D V8750
