E1-2100 vs Celeron N2805

E1-2100

2 Cores2 Thrd9 WWMax: 1 GHz2013

Celeron N2805

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 1.46 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

E1-2100

2 / 2

1,435

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N2805

2 / 2

1,430

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E1-2100 is positioned at rank 719 and the Celeron N2805 is on rank 250, so the Celeron N2805 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E1-2100

#706

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1022%

#707

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1007%

#708

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

925%

#709

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

921%

#710

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

912%

#712

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

881%

#713

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

845%

#714

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

843%

#715

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

821%

#719

E1-2100

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2805

#237

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

410%

#238

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

404%

#239

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

371%

#240

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

370%

#241

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

366%

#243

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

354%

#244

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

339%

#245

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

338%

#246

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

329%

#250

Celeron N2805

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron N2805 leads in gaming performance. However, the E1-2100 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.

Insight	E1-2100	Celeron N2805
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Kabini (2013−2014) / 28 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	E1-2100	Celeron N2805
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

E1-2100 Benchmark Check

Celeron N2805 Benchmark Check

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E1-2100 and Celeron N2805

E1-2100

The E1-2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,435 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron N2805

The Celeron N2805 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.46 GHz, with boost up to 1.46 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.3 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,430 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the E1-2100 and Celeron N2805 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the E1-2100 versus 1.46 GHz on the Celeron N2805 — a 37.4% clock advantage for the Celeron N2805. The E1-2100 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron N2805 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the E1-2100 scores 1,435 against the Celeron N2805's 1,430 — a 0.3% lead for the E1-2100. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	E1-2100	Celeron N2805
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1 GHz	1.46 GHz+46%
Base Clock	—	1.46 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1024 kB+100%	512K (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,435	1,430

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1-2100 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N2805 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	E1-2100	Celeron N2805
Socket	FT3	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	1066
Max RAM Capacity	—	4
RAM Channels	—	1
ECC Support	—	❌
PCIe Lanes	—	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E1-2100) / true (Celeron N2805). The Celeron N2805 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the E1-2100 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N2805 rivals AMD E1-2100.