E1-7010
VS
Celeron B830

E1-7010 vs Celeron B830

AMD

E1-7010

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Celeron B830

2 Cores2 Thrd0 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E1-7010 is positioned at rank 949 and the Celeron B830 is on rank 869, so the Celeron B830 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E1-7010

#936
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1789%
#937
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1763%
#938
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1618%
#939
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1611%
#940
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1596%
#942
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1541%
#943
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1478%
#944
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1476%
#945
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1436%
#948
FX-9800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
100%
#949
E1-7010
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#950
Celeron 1020E
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
100%
#953
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
99%
#955
Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
98%
#958
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
#959
Celeron 4305UE
MSRP: $107|Avg: $107
97%
#962
Core i7-10510U
MSRP: $409|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron B830

#856
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1440%
#857
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1419%
#858
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1302%
#859
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1296%
#860
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1284%
#862
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1240%
#863
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1189%
#864
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1187%
#865
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1156%
#869
Celeron B830
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#872
Celeron M 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
100%
#876
Microsoft SQ1
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
99%
#878
Core i5-6440HQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
99%
#881
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#883
Athlon II N330
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron B830 leads in gaming performance. However, the E1-7010 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightE1-7010Celeron B830
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Carrizo-L (2015) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightE1-7010Celeron B830
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E1-7010 and Celeron B830

AMD

E1-7010

The E1-7010 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 820 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Celeron B830

The Celeron B830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 815 points. Launch price was $86.

Processing Power

Both the E1-7010 and Celeron B830 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the E1-7010 versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron B830 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Celeron B830. The E1-7010 uses the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron B830 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the E1-7010 scores 820 against the Celeron B830's 815 — a 0.6% lead for the E1-7010.

FeatureE1-7010Celeron B830
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
1.8 GHz+20%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1024 kB+300%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Carrizo-L (2015)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
820
815
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1-7010 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron B830 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE1-7010Celeron B830
Socket
FP4
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E1-7010) / VT-x (Celeron B830). The Celeron B830 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the E1-7010 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B830 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B830 rivals Pentium 967.

FeatureE1-7010Celeron B830
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget