E1-7010
VS
Celeron E1600

E1-7010 vs Celeron E1600

AMD

E1-7010

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Celeron E1600

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E1-7010 is positioned at rank 949 and the Celeron E1600 is on rank 896, so the Celeron E1600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E1-7010

#936
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1789%
#937
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1763%
#938
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1618%
#939
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1611%
#940
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1596%
#942
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1541%
#943
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1478%
#944
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1476%
#945
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1436%
#948
FX-9800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
100%
#949
E1-7010
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#950
Celeron 1020E
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
100%
#953
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
99%
#955
Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
98%
#958
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
#959
Celeron 4305UE
MSRP: $107|Avg: $107
97%
#962
Core i7-10510U
MSRP: $409|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron E1600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
20268%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
19151%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
13905%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4189%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3318%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2903%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1663%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1641%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1494%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1494%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1477%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1437%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1417%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1412%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1399%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
96%
#896
Celeron E1600
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
100%
#897
Athlon II X2 270u
MSRP: $68|Avg: $10
100%
#898
Core i5-4570TE
MSRP: $202|Avg: $40
99%
#899
Core i3-2130
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
97%
#902
Core i3-6100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $50
96%
#903
Core i3-4330TE
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
95%
#904
Pentium E5700
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
95%
#906
Athlon II X3 420e
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
95%
#908
Celeron E1500
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
94%
#909
Pentium G6950
MSRP: $87|Avg: $25
94%
#910
Pentium J4205
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
93%
#911
Core i3-2120
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E1-7010 (2015) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3L-1333, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightE1-7010Celeron E1600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Carrizo-L (2015) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron E1600 (2009) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightE1-7010Celeron E1600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E1-7010 and Celeron E1600

AMD

E1-7010

The E1-7010 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 820 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Celeron E1600

The Celeron E1600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 815 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the E1-7010 and Celeron E1600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the E1-7010 versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron E1600 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Celeron E1600. The E1-7010 uses the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron E1600 uses Allendale (2006−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the E1-7010 scores 820 against the Celeron E1600's 815 — a 0.6% lead for the E1-7010.

FeatureE1-7010Celeron E1600
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
2.4 GHz+60%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1024 kB+100%
512 kB (total)
Process
28 nm-57%
65 nm
Architecture
Carrizo-L (2015)
Allendale (2006−2009)
PassMark
820
815
Geekbench 6 Single
310
Geekbench 6 Multi
560
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E1-7010 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron E1600 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE1-7010Celeron E1600
Socket
FP4
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E1-7010) / No (Celeron E1600). Primary use case: Celeron E1600 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E1600 rivals Pentium E2220.

FeatureE1-7010Celeron E1600
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget