E2-3000 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2200

E2-3000 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2200 Performance Spectrum

E2-3000

2 / 2

990

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

2 / 2

985

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E2-3000 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

E2-3000 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E2-3000

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (985 vs 990).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while E2-3000 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-3000 better than Pentium Dual-Core E2200?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium Dual-Core E2200 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, E2-3000 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-3000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-3000 is still the much better call for a fresh build. E2-3000 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. Pentium Dual-Core E2200 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2007 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (9.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-3000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

E2-3000 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

E2-3000

The E2-3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.65 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 990 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

The Pentium Dual-Core E2200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 985 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the E2-3000 and Pentium Dual-Core E2200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.65 GHz on the E2-3000 versus 2.2 GHz on the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Pentium Dual-Core E2200. The E2-3000 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the E2-3000 scores 990 against the Pentium Dual-Core E2200's 985 — a 0.5% lead for the E2-3000. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	E2-3000	Pentium Dual-Core E2200
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.65 GHz	2.2 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1024 kB	1 MB (total)
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	990	985

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-3000 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.