E2-9000
VS
Core 2 Duo T9500

E2-9000 vs Core 2 Duo T9500

AMD

E2-9000

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T9500

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E2-9000 is positioned at rank 700 and the Core 2 Duo T9500 is on rank 343, so the Core 2 Duo T9500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E2-9000

#687
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
985%
#688
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
971%
#689
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
891%
#690
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
887%
#691
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
879%
#693
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
849%
#694
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
814%
#695
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
813%
#696
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
791%
#700
E2-9000
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#704
C-60
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
100%
#711
Core i7-10850H
MSRP: $395|Avg: N/A
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T9500

#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
98%
#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
97%
#331
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
489%
#332
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
482%
#333
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
443%
#334
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
441%
#335
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
437%
#337
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
422%
#338
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
404%
#339
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
404%
#340
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
393%
#343
Core 2 Duo T9500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E2-9000 (2016) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightE2-9000Core 2 Duo T9500
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T9500 (2008) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightE2-9000Core 2 Duo T9500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E2-9000 and Core 2 Duo T9500

AMD

E2-9000

The E2-9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,787 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T9500

The Core 2 Duo T9500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,799 points. Launch price was $530.

Processing Power

Both the E2-9000 and Core 2 Duo T9500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the E2-9000 versus 2.6 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T9500 — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T9500 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The E2-9000 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T9500 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the E2-9000 scores 1,787 against the Core 2 Duo T9500's 1,799 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo T9500.

FeatureE2-9000Core 2 Duo T9500
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
2.6 GHz+18%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.6 GHz+44%
L3 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
1 MB
6 MB+500%
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,787
1,799
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-9000 uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T9500 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE2-9000Core 2 Duo T9500
Socket
BGA
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E2-9000) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo T9500). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T9500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T9500 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.

FeatureE2-9000Core 2 Duo T9500
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget