E2-9000
VS
Core i5-540M

E2-9000 vs Core i5-540M

AMD

E2-9000

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core i5-540M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.07 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E2-9000 is positioned at rank 700 and the Core i5-540M is on rank 432, so the Core i5-540M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E2-9000

#687
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
985%
#688
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
971%
#689
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
891%
#690
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
887%
#691
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
879%
#693
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
849%
#694
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
814%
#695
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
813%
#696
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
791%
#700
E2-9000
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#704
C-60
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
100%
#711
Core i7-10850H
MSRP: $395|Avg: N/A
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-540M

#419
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
572%
#420
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
563%
#421
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
517%
#422
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
515%
#423
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
510%
#425
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
493%
#426
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
472%
#427
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
472%
#428
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
459%
#432
Core i5-540M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E2-9000 (2016) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightE2-9000Core i5-540M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-540M (2010) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightE2-9000Core i5-540M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E2-9000 and Core i5-540M

AMD

E2-9000

The E2-9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,787 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Core i5-540M

The Core i5-540M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 3.07 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,796 points. Launch price was $257.

Processing Power

The E2-9000 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-540M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the E2-9000 versus 3.07 GHz on the Core i5-540M — a 33% clock advantage for the Core i5-540M (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The E2-9000 uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-540M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the E2-9000 scores 1,787 against the Core i5-540M's 1,796 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-540M.

FeatureE2-9000Core i5-540M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
3.07 GHz+40%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.53 GHz+41%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,787
1,796
Geekbench 6 Single
300
Geekbench 6 Multi
700
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E2-9000 uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-540M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE2-9000Core i5-540M
Socket
BGA
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E2-9000) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-540M). The Core i5-540M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the E2-9000 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-540M targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-540M rivals AMD Turion II Ultra M660.

FeatureE2-9000Core i5-540M
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop